Closed poojaranjan closed 8 months ago
https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/post-eip-erc-split-modification-of-erc-preamble-section/16301/3
i created a PR here with the first draft proposition for ERC-1, obviously it is still very far from what it should look like : https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/pull/61
I think we also need to start having discussions for what other topic groups (peer to EIP and ERC) would look and act like and how they are onboarded. Last week at the same time as the EIPIP meeting was the first "RollCall" for rollup developers and projects to coordinate, so a roll-up top level is a candidate with keen interest. Some questions I don't have strong opinions on that need answers:
@frangio intends to request to update ERC1271. Its security related so I will let him provide the information to the level of details he sees fit
@SamWilsn responded to questions https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/285#issuecomment-1787706955
Should new topic groups be independent of EIP/ERC or peer within the same structure?
- It hasn't been set in stone.
- The way it has been envisioned, they will be peers. ERC | Core-EIPs could become topic / working group.
Start-up: what is needed? an XIP-1 document? Initial editors/stewards?
- Most of the documentation is written.
- @SamWilsn will introduce it.
RIP numbering? even/odd won't work. Start from a different number?
- The current process uses a spreadsheet for numbering.
- It will be replaced with automated number allocation.
"Boundaries" - how do we determine what group a proposal goes to initially? Is that "portfolio/jurisdiction" baked into the XIP-1 document?
- Each topic group has sections that describe the area the topic group is interested in reviewing.
- New proposals will go into the most matching specific topic group.
How do we deal with specs that feel like they belong to multiple groups? Have one group have initial jurisdiction? Multiple specs? Joint specs?
- Will be determined case by case.
- The general advice is to go with the closest category.
Next step: @SamWilsn will be publishing the document as soon as possible. Early version here.
Update from editors' meeting https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/issues/1
@lightclient shared updates
ERC
category with EAS
which stands for Ethereum Application Standards. Wallet-ERC
, Rollup-ERC
DeFi-ERC
.@SamWilsn & @lightclient feel like this may be a topic of discussion for future meetings when we have clarity on the working group.
Decision:
Next step: Document ERC process, make a pull request and it will follow the normal numbering process but the proposal can be redirected from ERC-1 to that number.
Post EIP/ERC split : Modification of ERC preamble section Post EIP/ERC split : Create ERC-1, an ERC specific version of EIP-1 @NetWalker108
E shared his screen and explained the proposal. Most of the people on the call liked the document. Worth following on Fellowship of Ethereum Magicians.
https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/issues/8
- We couldn't discuss it as we ran out of time.
Closing in favor of #292
Date and Time
Nov 01, 2023 at 14:00 UTC
Location
Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel
YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw
Agenda
1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics
Call for Input
Changes to
Final
proposalsManual Merge TBA
2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings
3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.
4. EIP Editing Office Hour
5. Review action items from earlier meetings
6. Announcement
ERC@Devconnect