Closed SamWilsn closed 10 months ago
I am in favour of recognizing the current list.
Whether @g11tech and @xinbenlv were originally added as full EIP Editors or not, they've both participated actively in the process and have made excellent contributions in reviewing proposals and in governance.
+1
+1 (voting as an associate)
Since the deadline has elapsed, and all respondents are in favour, @g11tech and @xinbenlv are officially recognized as Editors :tada:
Call for Input
Background
@xinbenlv and @g11tech are listed as EIP Editors in EIP-1, but there is some question as to whether they are "EIP Editors" in the EIP-5069 sense. Since this came up on the last EIPIP call, I would like to settle this matter officially.
I am opening this Call for Input as "Unanimous" because this is akin to adding a new editor.