Closed SamWilsn closed 3 months ago
For the same reasons I mention in https://github.com/ethcatherders/EIPIP/issues/291#issuecomment-1789265565 I am opposed to merging this pull request.
reference implementation change and notices (security considerations for e.g. in 291) we should be able to update, will keep EIPs fresh but we need a good process to verify such a change
So is your opinion here, @g11tech, that we should or should not merge this PR?
i am opposed to the current PR but would prefer some sort of section which can list newer updates and links to it (some meta/info EIP updating the reference)
Thanks for clarifying. Closing this one since the only responses are opposed, but I am open to discuss a more comprehensive policy.
@g11tech @SamWilsn what do you guys think about re-doing the PR in the following way:
.sol
file post-audit, perhaps to a diff between the included reference implementation and the new oneSee https://github.com/ethcatherders/EIPIP/issues/291#issuecomment-1789265565 for a bit more detail on my reasoning, but the short form is Final means Final, and we only allow updates to correct errors in the specification.
Call for Input