search

ethereum-funding / blockrewardsfunding

Project Management is happening in this repo, see the Issues! This is a fork of ethereum/eips.
18 stars 3 forks source link

discrete groups and their concerns #13

Open owocki opened 5 years ago

owocki commented 5 years ago

what else?

bmann commented 5 years ago

Devs is too broad.

Core client developers is different than dapp builders.

And dapp builders have a bunch of needs that we definitely want to highlight, that are supported by work in other parts of the ecosystem.

owocki commented 5 years ago

tyty; good stuff!

lrettig commented 5 years ago

I'd add for-profit companies building on Ethereum.

We could add to this list endlessly but I think this is a solid start.

ghost commented 5 years ago

Users!

jpitts commented 5 years ago

RE: @bmann's comment

Devs is too broad.

Core client developers is different than dapp builders.

And dapp builders have a bunch of needs that we definitely want to highlight, that are supported by work in other parts of the ecosystem.

I would break these down to the following groups:

jpitts commented 5 years ago

RE: @owocki and "HODLers"

jpitts commented 5 years ago

Stakeholder groups need to get organized; many of these groups are not!

If they are not so organized, we can list a few notable contacts for each, and then reach out to them for concerns and feedback.

Someone needs to be responsible for this work. It is "community outreach".

pet3r-pan commented 5 years ago

We probably need to accept that we cannot cover this 100% from day one and even perhaps ever. But doesn't mean we can't improve it.

However, one way of gradually improving this is to periodically identify a segment area of the Ethereum community that can gain from representation then develop/source that individual as a representative. For example:

  • Q1: We are starting off with representatives from major orgs eg. EF, Consensys, Status, Church of Consensus etc.
  • Q2: We onboard identified community alliance representitives from the community eg. an DAO community representative of DAOstack, Aragon, DAOincubator etc. + then maybe a representitive of the dapp community eg. an alliance formed by the (State of the Dapps + DappRadar + dapp.com + ...)
  • Q3: Identify more communities to onboard, rinse repeat.

This will require:

  • Recruitment of community alliance leaders
  • Fostering of community alliances when certain areas of the community remains uncoordinated
  • Protocols for governing participating members

This can be achieved steadily done but will need to be done with care and will need dedicated energy. It is probably not the most resource conservative approach however, it can be done one way or another through brute force of diplomacy/people wrangling.

From https://github.com/ethereum-funding/blockrewardsfunding/issues/11#issuecomment-479117134