Closed chaals closed 2 years ago
@chaals ... not everyone reads the glossary. some redundancy is ok.
@chaals ... per decision in the WG meeting, please, respond to the above response. Otherwise, the issue will be closed at the next WG meeting.
I disagree, but this is an editorial decision. I won't continue the discussion.
WG agreed on 3/9 agreed to close the issue
Section 2.5 seems to say the same thing about a CCSM as the glossary, adding that they are important for a BPI.
That seems to be unnecessary repetition.