Closed chaals closed 2 years ago
@chaals ... you are more than welcome to do a PR with that change, if you feel strongly about it.
@GoldenBit0 @mehranshakeri and @Therecanbeonlyone1969 ... will take this on. @chaals, you are strongly encouraged to participate in this effort in this branch
@chaals looking for confirmation on the request. Are you looking for the requirements section to be linked - so when they are referred to within the specification and/or outside. See below for example. If this is accurate please let us know :)
[R34] The identifiers and identity utilized in a BPI MUST be controlled by its Principal Owner.
@GoldenBit0
@BriannaMRich Exactly!
@chaals Great!! @GoldenBit0 FYI
@chaals ... that is an absolute (to line 721) not a relative (R34) reference. We do need relative references, however.
cc @BriannaMRich ... see the above-referenced branch for relative links.
Is this already done? I see all the links are already fixed. If not, could you please guide me to where still needs review/correction?
Is this already done? I see all the links are already fixed. If not, could you please guide me to where still needs review/correction?
@mehranshakeri ... yes in the branch pr/101 ... as soon as the API spec .md file has been brought in alignment with the yaml we will do a PR
done with #114
Markdown is not helpful here, but writing them as e.g.
would enable links like
..spec.html#[r43]
to work