Closed 0xParticle closed 3 months ago
Are you sure that we need to deploy the L2 tokens via deposits from L1? That will increase the cost of creating these tokens. I believe we can get around this if the salt commits to the L1 token address + the erc20 properties fetched from the OptimismMintableERC20
token
Are you sure that we need to deploy the L2 tokens via deposits from L1? That will increase the cost of creating these tokens. I believe we can get around this if the salt commits to the L1 token address + the erc20 properties fetched from the
OptimismMintableERC20
token
After discussing this point, we will update the design doc to remove the need for L1 deployments. We will relax the metadata enforced condition and make it based on social consensous.
This looks ready for a design review meeting, the design at this point generally looks good to me
@mds1 Would love to have your eyes on this if you have time
Implementation PR for the token itself: https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/pull/11256
Description This document presents the requirements for a factory that deploys
SuperchainERC20
tokens for tokens native to L1.