ethereum-optimism / ecosystem-contributions

Find ways to contribute to the Optimism Collective
MIT License
309 stars 121 forks source link

Foundation Mission Request: Votable Supply Framework [RESEARCH] #261

Open elizarileyoak opened 4 weeks ago

elizarileyoak commented 4 weeks ago

How will this Foundation Mission Request help accomplish the above Intent?

Progress towards decentralization requires a further distribution of voting power. This necessitates a strategy involving targets for votable supply. Votable supply is the number of tokens able to cast a vote at any given time. Votable supply targets should be related to an understanding of the dominant attack vectors at different stages of decentralization and how that corresponds to the cost of attack. We define cost of attack as the number of tokens required for an actor to unilaterally ensure governance outcomes in the Token House. In an ideal scenario, votable supply targets would ensure a prohibitive cost of attack, against various attack vectors, at each stage of progressive decentralization.

What is required to execute this Foundation Mission Request?

This Foundation Mission aims to develop forward looking projections for votable supply, informed by a deep understanding of the dominant attack vectors at different stages of decentralization and how that corresponds to the cost of attack. The model used to make these projections should be dynamic so different scenarios can be assessed and so that it can be updated over time.

To execute this Mission Request, the grantee will work closely with the Foundation over a one-month period. The grantee will successfully execute the following steps:

Phase Activity Deliverable How to Measure Duration
Preparatory work: Research and Data Collection 1.0 Identify key factors and assumptions about the Foundation’s own forecasts relating to decentralization, token supply, growth initiatives, etc. List of key factors to be considered in model Comprehensive projection of Foundation milestones relevant to understanding different attack vectors over time 1 week
Preparatory work: Research and Data Collection 1.1 Identify key factors that influence the cost of attack (e.g., token distribution, liquidity, voting participation rates, governance vulnerabilities). Summary of key factors influencing the cost of attack based on review of existing research Evaluation of key variables based on relevance to the Collective 1 week (done in conjunction with 1.0)
Framework Development 2.0 Develop a model that calculates the votable supply required to maintain it above a pre-determined threshold under various conditions Model for calculating required votable supply; Scenario analyses of various conditions Ability for model to estimate the cost of attack above threshold under various scenarios 2 weeks
Framework Development 2.1. Run sensitivity analysis on key variables such as token supply, market volatility, and other relevant factors Sensitivity analysis Ability to understand how projections would change based on a change in assumptions of key variables such as token supply, market volatility, and other relevant factors 2 weeks (done in conjunction with 2.0)
Final Report and Presentation 3.0 Deliver an adaptive model alongside a comprehensive final report outlining votable supply targets, key assumptions, and rationale Adaptive model and final report Functionality of the model and thoroughness of the report 1 week
Final Report and Presentation 3.1. Discussion of deliverables from 3.0 with Foundation Presentation of outcomes to Foundation Implementation of model by the Foundation Deliver upon completion date

Delivery of the Final Framework and associated materials (by end of December 2024)

  1. A complete and functional model that defines the votable supply targets based on the required cost of attack and other factors.
  2. The model should be thoroughly tested, reviewed, and capable of making predictions to inform 2025 strategy and beyond.
  3. Provide scenario-based forecasting for votable supply starting with Q1 2025 onwards (per month), with sensitivity analysis on key variables (e.g., token price, liquidity, voter participation).
  4. Provide a list of assumptions, which have been reviewed and validated by the creators of this Mission Request.

How should impact be measured upon completion of this Foundation Mission Request? These should be focused on performance and may be used to assess your Misson’s impact.

To evaluate the impact of this proposal after completion, the following performance measures should be considered:

  1. Adoption of the Framework by the Optimism Foundation:
    • Measure the extent to which the proposed framework is adopted by the Collective’s governance structures and its influence on token supply-related decisions.
  2. Effectiveness in Preventing Governance Attacks:
    • Evaluate the extent to which the votable supply targets set by the framework successfully reduced the risk of governance attack at various stages.
  3. Sustainability of the Model:
    • Assess the framework’s adaptability over time and its ability to remain relevant as market conditions and governance dynamics evolve, e.g. as the Collective enters new phases along the decentralization roadmap.

Application instructions

To apply for this Foundation Mission Request, please complete the form in the expandable section below and leave your response as a comment on this issue thread. Submissions will be open until Friday 1 November 2024, at which time the Foundation will review all submissions and select up to two individuals /teams to complete the work defined here.

Submission form _Copy the entire application below and leave a comment on this issue with your answers completed. A representative from the Optimism Foundation may reach out using the contact info provided to request more information as necessary._ ## Foundation Mission Application * **Alliance Lead:** Please specify the best point of contact for your team * **Contact info:** * **L2 recipient address:** * **Please list the members of your Alliance and link to any previous work:** Read more about Alliances [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/season-4-alliance-guide/5873) **What makes your Alliance best-suited to execute this Mission?** - [...] - [...] **Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):** - [...] - [...] **Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each peice of work:** - [...] - [...] **Please define the [critical milestone(s)](https://gov.optimism.io/t/grant-policies/5833) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed on this proposal:** - [...] - [...] **Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):** - [...] - [...] **Grants are awarded in OP, locked for one year. Please let us know if access to upfront capital is a barrier to completing your Mission and you would like to be considered for a small upfront cash grant:** _(Note: there is no guarantee that approved Missions will receive up-front cash grants.)_ - [...] --- Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program: - [ ] I understand my grant for completing this RFP will be locked for one year from the date of proposal acceptance. - [ ] I understand that I will be required to provide additional KYC information to the Optimism Foundation to receive this grant - [ ] I understand my locked grant may be clawed back for failure to execute on critical milestones, as outlined in the [Operating Manual](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/OPerating-manual/blob/main/manual.md#valid-proposal-types) - [ ] I confirm that I have read and understand the [grant policies](https://gov.optimism.io/t/token-house-grant-policies/5833) - [ ] I understand that I will be expected to following the public grant reporting requirements outlined [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/suggested-public-reporting-requirements-for-grantees/4176) -- end of application --
francoperez03 commented 3 weeks ago

What makes your Alliance best-suited to execute this Mission

We are Franco, a Software Engineer specialized in blockchain solutions, and Luciana, a business developer and Product Marketing. We met at a hackathon and since then we have worked on technological projects, forming a multidisciplinary team with great synergy. We have deep knowledge of the Optimism virtual machine and we see this mission as an opportunity to actively contribute to the community and add value with our joint work.

Development of blockchain solutions:

Implementation of an automated alert system for MakerDAO. Its goal is to monitor jobs on the Ethereum blockchain and send notifications to a Discord channel if any job in the master network has not been executed for the past 10 consecutive blocks. https://github.com/francoperez03/job-sentinel

Platform for depositing tokens and requesting p2p loans https://github.com/francoperez03/p2p-loan-platform

Development of web3 on-chain game battle system deployed on Solana using NodeJS, Websocket, Solana-sdk and Metaplex-core

More than 5 years of experience architecting technological solutions based on NodeJS and AWS

Financial Analysis and Costing: Detailed financial analysis to assess the viability and performance of companies, including the calculation of service costs per client and financial projections.

Analysis and Restructuring of Business Plans: Analysis and restructuring of business plans to adapt them to target markets, creating attractive offers and modifying products according to market needs.

Implementation of "Profit First" Models in companies. Creation and Definition of innovative Business Models: by analyzing existing data, identifying risks, advantages and disadvantages, and designing strategies when there were no previous models.

Data Analysis for Projections and Marketing: analysis of data from advertising and financial campaigns to make projections

 

Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):

Our solution is to develop an interactive model in a Jupyter notebook to analyze and evaluate the cost of attack on Optimism governance. The model will have parameterizable inputs (OP token supply, voter turnout, prices, release dates, etc.) and will generate graphs and visualizations under different scenarios. We will include monthly forecasts of the votable supply since Q1 2025 and a detailed report with methodology, assumptions, results, and recommendations to strengthen governance.

 

Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each piece of work:

Week 1: Data Definition and Collection Goal: Establish the foundation of the project and obtain the necessary data.


Week 2: Data Analysis and Model Definition Goal: Analyze the data to inform the development of the model and establish its structure.


Week 3: Model Development and Interactive Tool Goal: Implement the model and create an interactive tool for its use.


Week 4: Validation and Monthly Forecasts Goal: Ensure the accuracy of the model and generate future forecasts.


Week 5: Documentation and Final Presentation Goal: Compile the findings and prepare the final delivery.

 

Please define the critical milestone(s) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed on this proposal:

Week 1 Milestone:

Week 2 Milestone:

Week 3 Milestone:

Week 4 Milestone:

Week 5 Milestone

 

Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):

In order to carry out this mission effectively and efficiently, we need support in the following areas:

Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program:

ARDev097 commented 3 weeks ago

Foundation Mission (RFP) Application

Here is the link to our Previous Work for the collective.

What makes your Alliance best-suited to execute this Mission?

Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):

Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each peice of work:

Our approach aligns with the mission’s requirements and follows a structured, step-by-step plan to achieve each milestone effectively. We have created this plan to match the steps outlined in the Foundation’s Mission Request (FMR) proposal exactly, as it does not require further changes. The plan is outlined as follows:

Step 1: Initial Alignment with Foundation Members (Preliminary)

Step 2:- Preparatory Work: Initial Research and Data Gathering (Week 1)

Step 3: Identification of Key Cost of Attack Variables (Week 1)

Step 4: Flexible Model Development - Votable Supply Framework Creation (Weeks 2-3)

Step 5:- Sensitivity Analysis for Core Variables (Weeks 2-3)

Step 6:- Final Report and Presentation (Week 4)

This plan is structured to optimize our existing knowledge and data resources, allowing for an efficient and high-quality deliverable by the end of the four weeks.

Please define the critical milestone(s) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed on this proposal:

To ensure the successful execution of this proposal, we have outlined the critical milestones exactly as provided in the RFP, as they do not require further modification. These milestones, along with specific deliverables and deadlines, will guide progress tracking and ensure that the mission objectives are met within the designated time frame, from November 11, 2024, to December 11, 2024.

Milestone 1:- Foundational Analysis of Governance Risks and Cost of Attack Variables


Milestone 1a: Preparatory Work and Data Collection

Milestone 1b: Identification of Cost of Attack Variables

Milestone 2:- Votable Supply Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis


Milestone 2a: Development of Votable Supply Model

Milestone 2b: Sensitivity Analysis of Key Variables

Milestone 3: Final Report and Presentation


We have divided our work into Milestones and created a roadmap to work on this research bounty. Sharing it here for reference.

Milestone Breakdown of this Research

Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):

Grants are awarded in OP, locked for one year. Please let us know if access to upfront capital is a barrier to completing your Mission and you would like to be considered for a small upfront cash grant: (Note: there is no guarantee that approved Missions will receive up-front cash grants.)

Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program:

-- end of application --

BilalBAI commented 2 weeks ago

Foundation Mission (RFP) Application

What makes your Alliance best-suited to execute this Mission?

Our Alliance is uniquely equipped to execute this Mission, combining both prior experience and complementary skills that are directly applicable to the task. We recently developed the Voting Influence and Concentration Analysis (VICA), a model tailored for the Optimism Collective, which provides a systematic framework for analyzing voting concentration, influence distribution, and governance risks. This model used a combination of network analysis, logistic regression, and counterfactual analysis to estimate voting blocs' influence and to develop concentration metrics. The skills and insights gained through VICA are directly transferable to this new mission’s objectives, as both projects address governance, risk of voting concentration, and the resilience of decentralization structures.

Our team consists of:

Bilal Bai, a seasoned quantitative analyst and certified risk manager with extensive experience in scenario analysis, stress test, sensitivity analysis, and risk factor modeling.

Yujie Yang, a PhD candidate in statistics at the University of Hong Kong, brings deep knowledge in the theory and application of complex networks and statistical modeling, providing a strong foundation for data analysis and network-based insights.

Together, our team’s experience in governance metrics, concentration analysis, and network-based risk assessment uniquely qualifies us to develop a dynamic model for votable supply projections, addressing both the decentralization targets and the associated governance attack risks.

Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):

The VICA model laid the groundwork for understanding how voting concentration affects governance stability, making it an ideal foundation for this project. By applying VICA’s clustering algorithms, influence metrics and concentration analysis, we can more accurately determine the votable supply required to minimize governance risks. Moreover, VICA’s counterfactual scenarios and sensitivity analysis have provided valuable insights into network behavior under different assumptions, which will inform our dynamic projections and cost of attack modeling.

Solution Components

Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each peice of work:

Execution Plan:

Please define the critical milestone(s) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed on this proposal:

Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):

To ensure the accuracy and applicability of our model, we request ongoing communication with the Optimism team to gain insights into token distribution plans, governance changes, and voting behavior patterns.

Grants are awarded in OP, locked for one year. Please let us know if access to upfront capital is a barrier to completing your Mission and you would like to be considered for a small upfront cash grant: (Note: there is no guarantee that approved Missions will receive up-front cash grants.)

N/A

Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program:

Pfed-prog commented 2 weeks ago

Foundation Mission Application

Alliance Lead: Pavel Fedotov Contact info: pavel@dspyt.com L2 recipient address: 0x60910E246924adff14b780405e79b280e627df7E

LinkedIn Profile

GitHub profile

X profile

Dspyt Profile

Ethereum Stack Exchange

Professional Background: Pavel is a Full Stack Blockchain Developer with over four years of experience in engineering decentralized applications using cutting-edge technologies such as Rust, Solidity, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, React, and Next.js.

Key Achievements:

Pin Save: Successfully completed the Filecoin grant aimed at advancing decentralized Identity standards (ERC-725) integrated with NFT frameworks. Notably, Pin Save secured a RetroPGF grant from the Optimism Foundation with 25 votes.

Academic Background: Holds a BA in Business Studies and Economics from the University of Manchester, graduating with Honours. Pavel also published a highly regarded academic article titled "Critical Analysis of the Electric Vehicle Industry: Five Forces and Strategic Action Fields" which garnered over 50,000 downloads.

Governance Expertise: Demonstrated involvement in governance with approximately 20 million ARB tokens delegated in two committee elections on Arbitrum: Arbitrum Procurement Committee and Arbitrum Research & Development.

Speaking Engagements: Pavel has presented at notable events such as ETH Belgrade 2024, IPFS Camp 2024, ETH Bucharest 2024, and Web3 Family Conference.

Data Science Contributions: His notable data science achievements in the web3 space include: Lifetime Gitcoin Grants Data Analysis and Hypothesis Testing report, Insights into Filecoin Storage Network Energy Consumption and Ethereum Security Data Collection Ideas.

LinkedIn Profile

GitHub profile

X profile

Dspyt Profile

Professional Background: Web3 advocate since 2022, specializing in blockchain governance and simplifying DeFi content for projects and communities. With in-depth knowledge, creates easy-to-understand content to reach broader audiences, supporting marketing efforts.

Key Achievements:

RetroPGF 6 Guest Badge Holder: Provided voting rationale for allocating retroPGF 6 funds.

Super Cohort 0: Completed and passed Super Cohort 0 Optimism Foundation training program.

Optimism Foundation related research: Researches and publishes optimism foundation related research. For instance, Unraveling the Potential of Optimism Blockchain.

What makes your Alliance best-suited to execute this Mission?

Our alliance benefits from a unique combination of technical expertise and hands-on experience in governance and decentralized applications. Pavel's background as a full-stack developer, coupled with my practical experience in governance mechanisms and risk management in blockchain ecosystems, positions our team to effectively deliver the votable supply framework.

We are well-equipped to analyze complex data sets and develop innovative solutions tailored to governance challenges faced by the Optimism Collective. Our familiarity with the technical and economic aspects of blockchain governance, combined with our commitment to community engagement, ensures that we can design a framework that significantly contributes to Optimism's decentralization and security objectives.

Our previous work on projects like Pin Save and our active participation in governance activities demonstrate a proven history of delivering valuable, impactful contributions to the community.

As a team, we are eager to harness our skills to create an adaptive, data-driven model that supports effective governance and minimizes vulnerabilities within the system. Our experience in scenario analysis and risk assessment will be critical in building a robust framework that accurately reflects the complexities of the Optimism ecosystem while prioritizing decentralization and long-term sustainability.

Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):

Our proposed solution is to develop a comprehensive and dynamic framework for calculating votable supply targets that minimizes the cost of attack while facilitating effective governance within the Optimism Collective. This framework aims to ensure a well-distributed and secure governance structure essential for advancing the decentralization objectives of the Optimism ecosystem.

Solution Components:

  1. Data Collection and Analysis:
    We will initiate our work by gathering on-chain data from reputable sources such as Dune Analytics. This data will include information on token distribution, voting participation rates, and governance history. The analysis will help us identify historical trends, voting behaviors, and patterns of token utility. We will conduct a thorough Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) to visualize key factors influencing governance, such as:

    • Distribution of token holdings.
    • Participation trends in governance votes.
    • Historical context of governance engagements.
  2. Risk Assessment:
    Building on our initial data analysis, we will perform a risk assessment to identify potential governance vulnerabilities and the primary attack vectors that could be exploited at different stages of decentralization. This will involve evaluating various aspects, including:

    • Token liquidity and concentration of holdings.
    • Historical data on governance vulnerabilities. We will calculate the cost of attack—defined as the number of tokens required to unilaterally influence decision-making within the governance framework—using our analysis of token distributions and participation dynamics.
  3. Model Development:
    We will create a flexible and adaptive model capable of computing the necessary votable supply targets that ensure a prohibitive cost of attack. This model will include:

    • Scenarios and sensitivities allowing us to assess changes in key variables such as token supply, governance engagement, and market conditions.
    • An interactive implementation in a user-friendly Jupyter Notebook, enabling stakeholders to input different parameters and visualize the impact on votable supply and associated governance risks.
  4. Scenario Planning:
    The framework will involve conducting scenario analyses to simulate various conditions (e.g., high participation vs. low participation and fluctuating market values). For each scenario, we will generate forecasts for votable supply starting from Q1 2025 onward, outlining the implications for governance resilience and security.

  5. Final Report and Recommendations:
    The culmination of our efforts will be documented in a comprehensive final report that outlines our findings, key assumptions, and results from the scenario analyses. It will include:

    • Actionable recommendations for the Optimism Collective to implement, aimed at achieving optimal votable supply structures.
    • Strategies for proactive measures against governance risks.

This robust approach endeavors not only to fulfill the immediate requirements of the Foundation Mission but also to provide valuable insights that will shape the future governance dynamics of the Optimism Collective. By developing a targeted framework for votable supply, we aim to enhance decentralization, security, and resilience in governance processes.

Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each peice of work:

Step-by-Step Plan to Execute the Mission

To effectively execute the mission of developing the votable supply framework, we have outlined a detailed plan that aligns with the mission's objectives. This plan includes specific tasks, expected deadlines, and deliverables for each stage of the project.

Week 1: Preparatory Work, Research and Data Collection

Week 2: Framework Development

Week 3: Final Report and Presentation

Milestones for Execution

This structured plan ensures that we systematically address each critical aspect of the mission while adhering to the project timeline, facilitating the timely delivery of a robust framework that fulfills the goals of the Optimism Collective.

Please define the critical milestone(s) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed on this proposal:

Critical Milestones to Determine Execution of the Proposal

To effectively assess the execution of this proposal for developing a framework to set votable supply targets, the following critical milestones will serve as key indicators of progress and success. Each milestone corresponds to significant deliverables and phases of the project.

Critical Milestone 1: Completion of Preparatory Research and Data Collection

Critical Milestone 2: Completion of Votable Supply Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis

Critical Milestone 3: Delivery of Final Model and Comprehensive Report

Critical Milestone 4: Presentation and Discussion of Deliverables with the Foundation

Overall Completion Assessment

Upon reaching these milestones, a final assessment will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the framework developed for votable supply targets and its alignment with the goals of the Optimism Collective. Each milestone will be measured against predefined criteria to ensure that the project meets the established objectives related to governance, decentralization, and the reduction of attack risks within the governance structure.

By adhering to these milestones, we will ensure the successful execution of the proposal, providing the necessary framework to enhance the governance mechanisms within the Optimism ecosystem.

Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):

Additional Support Required to Execute This Mission

To effectively carry out this mission, our team would require the following support:

  1. Financial Support:

    • Dune Analytics Plus Plan License: We require funding for a Dune Analytics Plus Plan license or equivalent financial support of approximately $399 USD. This tool is essential for downloading CSV files of data from the Optimism network and is critical for our data collection and analysis efforts.
    • Project Dedication Compensation: To ensure full dedication to this mission and to concentrate our resources on delivering maximum value to the Optimism community, we request an advance of 800 OP. This advance would help cover the resources and time invested in the project, as the total reward of 8000 OP is inteded to be locked for one year.
  2. Technical Support:

    • Collaboration with Optimism Team Members: Engaging with members of the Optimism Foundation or governance experts for validation and feedback on our assumptions during the model development process would greatly enhance the relevance and alignment of our work with community needs and expectations.

By securing this additional support, we will be better positioned to execute the mission efficiently, ensuring high-quality deliverables that benefit the Optimism Collective.

Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program:

raphbaph commented 2 weeks ago

Foundation Mission Application

Alliance Lead: Christian Ziegler Contact info: christian@stablelab.xyz L2 recipient address: 0x9c489E4efba90A67299C1097a8628e233C33BB7B

StableLab and its Forse team consist of:

What makes your Alliance best suited to execute this Mission?

StableLab is one of the leading teams in decentralized governance operations. It has recently expanded its offering with FORSE, a DAO analytics platform pioneering deeper insights into on- and off-chain parameters and their effect on DAO governance and its goals.

Please describe your proposed solution based on the above Solution Criteria (if applicable):

We posit that governance security as measured by the ability of a single actor unilaterally deciding a token-weighted poll is not directly coupled to votable supply per se, but instead to other factors. Primarily voting power inequality (think one massive whale and the rest shrimp). Another important factor for the cost of attack is that the chance to succeed can be drastically reduced with execution timelocks coupled with a capable Guardian role (in the case of OZ Governor contracts).

Our proposed solution therefore aims to track voting power inequality first, suggest a dynamic quorum based on multiple relevant metrics second, and introduce a path to a truly decentralized Guardian role third.

Multiple factors influence the cost/reward of a successful governance attack:

Further, token issuance increases token liquidity and decreases the cost of an attack somewhat, though the relationship is not linear or direct.

We propose setting votable supply distribution inequality targets instead or in addition to total votable supply targets. The former is more relevant to governance security than the latter.

We propose introducing a dynamic quorum (as pioneered by MakerDAO). MakerDAO features a quorum, where each successive proposal needs to surpass the previous one in the amount of MKR that voted. Instead of this simple measure, we propose to do ongoing data analytics that computes potential future voting power as a function of the sort: ~ quorum_n ( vp_c, quorum_n-1, votes_n-1)

While a full model will be built in coorperation and to the desires of the OP Foundation, current planning would follow these limitations:

Further constraints would include:

All Proposals would ensure that the next Quorum is at least the biggest last voting power + X % where X is a percentage to be defined. This ensures that no big player can pass proposals alone, while minimizing the impact on the running governance process.

If proposals repeatedly fail to reach quorum, quorum power will fall off in a similar inverse fashion, with change starting gradually before entering a faster rate and finally trailing off again.

This magnitude will asymptotically approximate a value computed from the token distribution and voting supply over the last N proposals. Change_quroum = cq(last_passed_quroum, recent votingsupply, N quorum misses proposals, MN max N that will reach the lowest possible quorum) Cq ~ sigmoid(-1*(N + MN/2)) + f(last_passed_quroum, recent votingsupply) Where MN has to be bigger than the top X addresses that have voted in the last M proposals.

Deliverables

Please outline your step-by-step plan to execute this Mission, including expected deadlines to complete each piece of work:

Step Deadline Definition
1 2024-11-30 Analyze the current conditions of $OP distribution inequality, voting behavior, and power concentration and define the model weights that govern dynamic quorum.
2 2024-12-07 Create public-facing charts for the dynamic quorum weight with multiple options that simulate different curves and parameter weights. The dashboard will also display the key metrics that go into the model.
3 2024-12-31 Create a report identifying key conditions necessitating token emissions to maintain decentralization needs, governance security, and functionality. Identify relevant user types and distribution inequality targets for these emissions, with corresponding addresses if possible.
4 2024-12-31 Create a report about implementing a decentralized Guardian role.

Please define the critical milestone(s) that should be used to determine whether you’ve executed this proposal:

Please list any additional support your team would require to execute this mission (financial, technical, etc.):

We would need a deeper understanding of the planned emissions schedules and desired governance security of Optimism. StableLab requests 25,000 OP to create the dashboards and reports mentioned in this report. If you'd like more analysis and consultation, this would require a future engagement and would not be covered by this mission.

Grants are awarded in OP, locked for one year. Please let us know if access to upfront capital is a barrier to completing your Mission and you would like to be considered for a small upfront cash grant: (Note: there is no guarantee that approved Missions will receive up-front cash grants.)

We would appreciate a 7,000 OP upfront payment, with the remaining 18,000 OP locked for one year.

Please check the following to make sure you understand the terms of the Optimism Foundation RFP program: x I understand my grant for completing this RFP will be locked for one year from the proposal acceptance date. x I understand that I will be required to provide additional KYC information to the Optimism Foundation to receive this grant x I understand my locked grant may be clawed back for failure to execute on critical milestones, as outlined in the Operating Manual x I confirm that I have read and understand the grant policies x I understand that I will be expected to following the public grant reporting requirements outlined here

elizarileyoak commented 4 days ago

Hi all – thanks for the excellent submissions for this Foundation Mission Request. 🔴✨

The Optimism Foundation has selected two teams to move forward with the work described in this Foundation Mission. The head alliance names are:

-- Christian Ziegler (mission scoped from above proposal to 12K OP) -- Chain_L

Congratulations! We will be in touch via email/ TG to kick off the grant agreement and discuss next steps.

For everyone else: We'd love to help you find the right way to contribute to the Optimism Collective! There are many open Delegate Mission requests and you can expect more research-focused Foundation Missions to follow soon.