Closed protolambda closed 2 years ago
Merging #446 (60166e6) into main (8cbaf02) will decrease coverage by
0.30%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.:exclamation: Current head 60166e6 differs from pull request most recent head 82b5107. Consider uploading reports for the commit 82b5107 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #446 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 52.59% 52.28% -0.31%
==========================================
Files 70 70
Lines 7855 7855
==========================================
- Hits 4131 4107 -24
- Misses 3176 3197 +21
- Partials 548 551 +3
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 52.28% <ø> (-0.31%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
op-bindings/deposit/deposit_feed_raw.go | 11.40% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-bindings/l1block/l1_block_info_raw.go | 28.27% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-bindings/l2oo/l2_output_oracle.go | 8.60% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-bindings/withdrawer/withdrawer_raw.go | 4.18% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-e2e/setup.go | 72.88% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-node/withdrawals/utils.go | 59.23% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-proposer/drivers/l2output/driver.go | 65.19% <ø> (ø) |
|
op-node/testlog/testlog.go | 58.46% <0.00%> (-18.47%) |
:arrow_down: |
op-node/node/api.go | 59.25% <0.00%> (-4.45%) |
:arrow_down: |
op-proposer/service.go | 90.78% <0.00%> (-3.95%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 5 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8cbaf02...82b5107. Read the comment docs.
Separate the contract bindings into a new go module.
This fixes a cyclic dependency where
op-node
would import bindings fromop-proposer
, whileop-proposer
imports types fromop-node
.This also simplifies the build system nicely: there's one place and one makefile to use when contracts change.
Edit: also did some
go mod tidy
ing: the geth version we pull in with thereplace
is v1.10.17+ already, but therequire
was still on 1.10.16Since the bindings are all generated code I did not include this new module in the coverage reporting CI. (And we don't use all of the bindings anyway)