Closed Pandapip1 closed 2 years ago
Please could you check PR 87. I think that resolves this issue either.
Addressed by EIPW now.
It isn't (see ethereum/eipw#11), and only checking the EIP itself is on the roadmap. I don't have any plans to scan Solidity files (or package.json
, or any other package manager's files.)
I don't have any plans to scan Solidity files (or package.json, or anything other package manager's files.)
Uh, why not? It goes way better in the validator than it does here.
Uh, why not?
I feel like scanning projects for licenses is incredibly hard, and I'd rather not create a lint that gives an over-exaggerated sense of safety.
I can write those lints if you want. I'd have to learn rust first, but it can't be too hard... right?
Rust is fun! Totally open to a PR, but keep my concern in mind.
Did one better: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/5379. Now you can continue to only care about EIPs and let other actions do the other work :)
Re-opening this until this gets implemented somewhere, or an issue to track the problem is created somewhere.
Tracked in https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/5379
This would help avoid things like https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/assets/eip-4400/contracts/ERC721Consumable.sol having the wrong license.