Closed mryalamanchi closed 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm surprised the bot allowed that to be merged. PR to rename it would be very much appreciated! Feel free to mention me on such a PR. No need to do any complicated migration as the EIP is just a draft and only recently merged.
Alright! Will just rename the EIP now and later check with the bot issue.
APMU, the EIPs are to be numbered and not contain the EIP title. This EIP's filename has deviated from the common practice and has also generated a deviated link eip-micropayments_standard_for_nfts_and_multi_tokens
Should this be handled the same way eip-20-token-standard.md -> eip-20 was handled?