Closed sullof closed 2 months ago
✅ All reviewers have approved.
The commit 92d38e96b3a488cb067e3868a42c3c2a9ff5b88d (as a parent of 9ad71a4254908216e5b2991dde11100f81b1a648) contains errors. Please inspect the Run Summary for details.
@abcoathup I am having bot errors that are unrelated to the PR's proposed changes. Do you know which is the best practice in these cases?
@abcoathup I am having bot errors that are unrelated to the PR's proposed changes. Do you know which is the best practice in these cases?
@sullof I assume you resolved them.
For unrelated review-bot issues I suggest reporting in the EIP-editors channel of EthCatHerders Discord.
@abcoathup I made another push but obtained the same error. Then, at some moment, the issue got fixed by itself. I have no idea why. Anyway, thanks, I will ask in the Discord server
After conversations with members of the community, it was clear that the name
IERC7656Linked
was better thanIERC7656Contract
but still not ideal. Then, the decision to change it toIERC7656Service
, which better aligns with the goal of the ERC, i.e., allowing NFT to own services that extend the capability of the single NFT.