Closed mcdee closed 1 month ago
This looks good. Will cross-post and seek more opinions.
I support this. Our validator client currently needs to grab the full validator to get the index
I support this. Our validator client currently needs to grab the full validator to get the index
Curious, do you track the validator status on the VC side? This has a lot of benefits, e.g. not querying duties for exited validators, not registering to builder etc. but it would still require to query the full validator object if we don't include all information in this API to recalculate the status, or include the status itself here, preferably in a format that can be ssz-serialized.
Curious, do you track the validator status on the VC side?
No, we don't. I agree it would allow for certain optimizations, but I am not sure if it's worth the extra complexity.
I think i prefer the idea that this is a simple index lookup that would allow us to continue to use it in a post index being unique world, and for the rest of the data you have the indices you could look up further info...
we can definitely add this to changes table though...
In support of #449.