Closed djrtwo closed 1 year ago
@djrtwo I believe these items have been solved except for the final episub spec?
We're leaning towards https://github.com/libp2p/specs/pull/548 as replacement for episub - I haven't seen much activity on the episub front lately though @AgeManning would know more maybe.
Yep, I think we can do the IDONTWANT message as a precursor to episub.
Episub has a very large parameter space and its not immediately obvious the best parameters for our network. It requires more analysis and is something we have put on hold for a bit in favour of some more direct gains. However we've added some more resources to our team to take up this analysis.
So we're happy to go with IDONTWANT and if we can see some gains in episub, we may push that later on.
Thank you @arnetheduck @AgeManning for your responses! Closing this issue now unless anyone wants to reopen it.
A number of spec modifications need to happen after discussions at devcon:
MIN_EPOCHS_FOR_BLOBS_SIDECARS_REQUESTS
to ~2 weeks or loweris_data_available()
check for importing a blockMAX_REQUEST_BLOBS_SIDECARS
value