davesque
commented
6 years ago @carver Yes, that's a good idea. Actually, the community member who originally identified this issue ( @tristan ) in pr #90 provided an example encoding which was being returned from a contract. I did confirm that our implementation creates the same encoding. However, it wouldn't hurt to check a more complicated use case.
What was wrong?
Array encoding was not using head-tail encoding when necessary (for dynamic elements) as was discovered in the discussion for this PR: #90 .
Closes #93
How was it fixed?
Added this behavior and updated tests.
Cute Animal Picture