Update Everstake Pooled Staking Solution info

[omykhailovskyi]

Project name

Everstake 0.1+ ETH staking

Product type

Staking pool

If other product type, please describe

No response

Logo

img https://everstake.one/img/Everstake-logo.svg https://everstake.one/img/Everstake-256.png https://everstake.one/img/Everstake-1024.png logo https://everstake.one/logo/logo-big-black.svg https://everstake.one/logo/logo-big-white.svg https://everstake.one/logo/logo-small-white.svg https://everstake.one/logo/logo-small-black.svg

Description

Change values to next one Battle Tested = True Live > 1 year, 14 September will be 1 year live "pctMajorityExecutionClient": 50, - Diversified "pctMajorityConsensusClient": 50 - Diversified

Website

https://stake.everstake.one/ethereum/

If software is involved, is everything open source?

No, code is closed source

Is the project a fork? If yes, which project was forked?

No

Is the product out of beta development?

Yes, live > 1 year, 14 September will be 1 year live

What wallets support the product or service?

Trezor, Exodus, ZenGo

If the product or service enables staking with <32 ETH, what is the minimum ETH required to stake?

0.1 ETH

If a service, what are the fees associated with using the service?

10%

If the product or service involved a liquidity token, what are the tokens involved?

No response

What date did the project or service go live?

14.09.2023

Has the project undergone an external security audit?

Yes. Chainsecurity and Ackee https://www.chainsecurity.com/security-audit/everstake-eth-b2c-staking https://ackee.xyz/blog/everstake-ethereum-staking-protocol-audit-summary/

Has the project undergone any security bug bounties?

No

Is the project being actively maintained?

Yes

Is the product or service free of trusted/human intermediaries?

Everstake's solution is free of trusted/human intermediaries.

If a pooled staking service, can users participate as a node operator without permission?

There is no option to run an operator within the pool by some user. The only node operator is Everstake, which is responsible for running all validators for staked ETH.

If listing a staking-as-a-service, are users required to sign-up for an account?

No response

If listing as staking-as-a-service, who has access to the signing keys?

No response

If a pooled staking service or SaaS provider, what type of withdrawal credentials are being utilized / who holds the withdrawal keys?

Within our ETH staking solution rewards from all validators goes to a predefined address in the smart contract. We solely use Withdraw Authority / execution address, known as “type 1” withdrawal credentials.

If a pooled staking service or SaaS provider, what percent of node operators are running a super-majority client?

We run 25% Geth Nimbus, 25% Geth Prysm, and 25% Nethermind Teku, 25% Nethermind Lighthouse on the EL. As for CL, we prefer using Ligthouse 50%, Nimbus ~ 45% and Teku ~5%

If listing node or client tooling, which consensus layer clients (Lighthouse, Teku, Nimbus, or Prysm) are supported?

All of them - Lighthouse, Teku, Nimbus, Prysm

What platforms are supported?

No response

What user interfaces are supported?

Our own web app; browser extensions; mobile, desktop and web apps that integrated with our solution

Social media links

"discord": "https://discord.gg/NvcW47V3Xb", "twitter": "https://twitter.com/everstake_pool", "medium": "https://medium.com/everstake"

Would you like to work on this issue?

• [X] Yes
• [ ] No

[wackerow]

We run 25% Geth Nimbus, 25% Geth Prysm, and 25% Nethermind Teku, 25% Nethermind Lighthouse on the EL.

These are EL<>CL pairs (Geth/Nethermind are EL, but Nimbus/Prysm/Teku/Lighthouse are CL).. Should we interpret this as 50% Geth, 50% Nethermind?

[wackerow]

If that's the case, looks like we need to update pctMajorityExecutionClient and pctMajorityConsensusClient values to 50.

The "Battle Tested" indicator is based on the existing launch date, and this has already updated to a green check in production.

@omykhailovskyi I see you marked "Yes" yo wanting to work on this. I'll go ahead and assign.. if you wouldn't mind just clarifying the above question, then a PR is welcome! Thanks

[omykhailovskyi]

Hey, @wackerow Thanks. So basically need to adjust value for pctMajorityConsensusClient, as we now meet the requirement - Service should not run more than 50% of their aggregate validators with a majority consensus client

[wackerow]

I see you've unassigned yourself, I'll assign myself to handle

[irina-everstake]

@wackerow, really appreciate your help 🙏