Closed mkalinin closed 2 months ago
Was talking to @mkalinin about this today. Looks like both V1 and V2 are backwards compatible and we won't want to deal with switching endpoints at the fork since they might be used during syncing for example. It probably makes sense to just extend V1.
prysm implemented v2 but not that big of a deal to go back if there's consensus on that
Was talking to @mkalinin about this today. Looks like both V1 and V2 are backwards compatible and we won't want to deal with switching endpoints at the fork since they might be used during syncing for example. It probably makes sense to just extend V1.
I agree, I think it will be better to extend V1. We added V2 methods for now
Introduces
ExecutionPayloadBodyV2
to accommodatedepositRequests
andwithdrawalRequests
added to the payload body in Prague, this entails adding newengine_getPayloadBodiesByRangeV2
andengine_getPayloadBodiesByHashV2
methods. This PR also contains a few naming adjustments in the examples part of the schema.