The pattern for hex encoded 256 bit unsigned integer doesn't look correct to me:
^0x([1-9a-f]+[0-9a-f]{0,31})|0$
I think there are two problems here. The first one is that the + there means that one million 1s would be a valid value, which is obviously incorrect.
And if the + is removed, there's still a problem, because then the string has a length of at most 32 hex characters, but for a 32-byte value the max length should be 64 hex characters.
I think the right pattern should be:
^0x([1-9a-f][0-9a-f]{0,63})|0$
I don't know why the test for this works fine though. I haven't checked how these tests are executed, and if they validate the patterns somehow.
The pattern for hex encoded 256 bit unsigned integer doesn't look correct to me:
I think there are two problems here. The first one is that the
+there means that one million1s would be a valid value, which is obviously incorrect.And if the
+is removed, there's still a problem, because then the string has a length of at most 32 hex characters, but for a 32-byte value the max length should be 64 hex characters.I think the right pattern should be:
I don't know why the test for this works fine though. I haven't checked how these tests are executed, and if they validate the patterns somehow.