codecov-commenter
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 2208 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
673ccec) 69.91% compared to head (4eaed5f) 69.93%. Report is 53 commits behind head on forks/cancun.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## forks/cancun #851 +/- ## ================================================ + Coverage 69.91% 69.93% +0.01% ================================================ Files 609 610 +1 Lines 33980 34309 +329 ================================================ + Hits 23758 23993 +235 - Misses 10222 10316 +94 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/851/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/851/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum) | `69.93% <26.12%> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What was wrong?
EIP-5656, which is slated for Cancun, is not currently implemented in the specs.
How was it fixed?
Implemented EIP-5656