codecov-commenter
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
9ca885c) 74.12% compared to head (30695b3) 74.12%.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| src/ethereum/arrow_glacier/fork.py | 0.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
| src/ethereum/gray_glacier/fork.py | 0.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #886 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 74.12% 74.12% ======================================= Files 572 572 Lines 32419 32419 ======================================= Hits 24030 24030 Misses 8389 8389 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/886/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/886/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum) | `74.12% <60.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ethereum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What was wrong?
Post London, the
gas_feecalculated infork.pyin in fact the max gas that can be paid in the transaction. The variable is renamed accordingly.Related to Issue #877
How was it fixed?
Renamed the relevant variable.
Cute Animal Picture