search

ethereum / pm

Project Management: Meeting notes and agenda items
Other
1.6k stars 326 forks source link

Consensus-layer Call 135 #1069

Closed ralexstokes closed 5 months ago

ralexstokes commented 5 months ago

Consensus-layer Call 135

prev: call 134

Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2024/6/13 at 14:00 UTC Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours stream

  1. Announcement
  2. Electra
  3. Research, spec, etc
    • F-star naming: Fulu, Felis, ?
  4. Open discussion/Closing remarks
barnabasbusa commented 5 months ago

Kurtosis team plans to open source their entire project. (https://x.com/KurtosisTech/status/1800258729289355763) There is currently a plan to migrate the ethereum-package from their repo to the ethpandaops organization on 13th of June.

From their announcement channel: 

We will be transferring the Ethereum Package to ethPandaOps this Thursday 2024-06-14

From then on to access the Kurtosis package you will have to do

kurtosis run github.com/ethpandaops/ethereum-package
...

This is a pretty big breaking change, as it will break literally everyone's workflow until they don't change the url. Would like to discuss what this will mean for us/client teams in the coming days/weeks.

hwwhww commented 5 months ago

I'd nudge on getting the finality of the F-star naming again this week.

The ChatGPT-generated proposals: https://hackmd.io/oVQCHuOdT-q2KN9YrD-r7w

In the last call, iirc "Fulu" and "Felis" received a lot of support in the zoom chat. It seems people like shorter names. I'd add that "Foramen" is cool because of the Ramen x Osaka theme (🍜 x🏯)!

p.s. I think Felis looks like a typo of Felix (@fjl 😂)

fjl commented 5 months ago

I'm totally up for having a fork named after me.

timbeiko commented 5 months ago

Draft PR to include PeerDAS in the Pectra Meta EIP once we've clarified how it will be reflected in the CL specs.

etan-status commented 5 months ago

SSZ https://stabilitynow.box

🦒

hwwhww commented 5 months ago

I'd like to confirm if it's okay to merge https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3768 in the call.

timbeiko commented 5 months ago

Review request for the PFI/CFI/SFI EIP: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/8662

We don't have to discuss on the call, but client team reviews of the proposal would be appreciated 😄

Biggest open question: do we want CFI to have an explicit "gate", i.e. 1 (+?) client team thinks an EIP should be in an upgrade?

abcoathup commented 5 months ago

I'd nudge on getting the finality of the F-star naming again this week.

@hwwhww I dug my F-star name discussion post out of drafts on Eth Magicians. (I had been waiting for Pectra scope to be finalized). It is a wiki post so feel free to edit. https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/f-star-name-for-consensus-layer-upgrade-after-electra/20285

gorondan commented 5 months ago

Review request for the PFI/CFI/SFI EIP: ethereum/EIPs#8662

We don't have to discuss on the call, but client team reviews of the proposal would be appreciated 😄

Biggest open question: do we want CFI to have an explicit "gate", i.e. 1 (+?) client team thinks an EIP should be in an upgrade?

ref. explicit "gate" : The current version of https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/8662 (based on @abcoathup 's EthMag feedback on the way for the Upgrade Meta EIP author to avoid spam proposals) seems fairer than adding an explicit gate.

ralexstokes commented 5 months ago

closing in lieu of #1084