Closed dbarobin closed 11 months ago
- Is there a deadline for making BLS to Execution Change? Alternatively, can these be modified at any time without upgrading in Shanghai?
a validator that has 0x00
credentials can issue a one time BLS to Execution Change
message at any time after the capella
/Shanghai
fork activates to swap to 0x01
credentials
- Is it mandatory for the withdrawal address to be the same as the deposit address? Is it possible to set multiple nodes to the same withdrawal address?
the execution layer address used in the 0x01
credential type can be any execution layer address you want and there is no correlation at the consensus layer for these so, for example, you could set 10 validators to all have the same target execution layer address
- Can the withdrawal address be set to the multi-signature address generated by Gnosis Safe?
if you are just talking about a deployment of the Gnosis Safe multi-sig, then yes you would just set the 0x01
credential address to the address of the deployed contract -- note that there could be caching layers in between the chain and the Gnosis Safe UI so that it may show the wrong balance but that would just be a bug in the UI (and I assume quickly fixed if it is not already accounted for)
OK, thank you, @ralexstokes.
Another question, if I deposit ETH into the staking contract using the--eth1_withdrawal_address
, that means the deposit address is the same as --eth1_withdrawal_address
, the MEV profit will send to the --eth1_withdrawal_address
as before (sent to the deposit address)?
BTW, I tested depositing ETH using a multisig address generated by Gnosis Safe, but the invoked contract address is not the multisig address. The deposit address is the final address(another address in the multisig group) that invoked the staking contract. So maybe using multisig as the deposit address and the --eth1_withdrawal_address
have some uncertain problem.
Another question, if I deposit ETH into the staking contract using the--eth1_withdrawal_address, that means the deposit address is the same as --eth1_withdrawal_address, the MEV profit will send to the --eth1_withdrawal_address as before (sent to the deposit address)?
assuming by "MEV profit" you are referring to execution layer rewards from each block proposal, the 0x01
withdrawal credential address has nothing to do with this; they are independent addresses
BTW, I tested depositing ETH using a multisig address generated by Gnosis Safe, but the invoked contract address is not the multisig address. The deposit address is the final address(another address in the multisig group) that invoked the staking contract. So maybe using multisig as the deposit address and the --eth1_withdrawal_address have some uncertain problem.
if you use the same address you would use to send funds to the multisig as the execution withdrawal address then it should all work
I have a few questions regarding withdrawal addresses:
--eth1_withdrawal_address
through the Staking Deposit CLI, why is it still necessary to enter the withdrawal address on Launchpad?Thanks.