Update owned solidity and ipfs links

[njgheorghita]

Updated solidity version used in owned.sol Updated & pinned ipfs uri's containing documentation and source solidity

[njgheorghita]

Is there any benefit to coming up with a suggested standard format for the linked documentation? Or is it better to just leave it open-ended?

[davesque]

Do you mean a standard format as in markdown, rst, html?

[davesque]

@njgheorghita These changes look good. You didn't request review from me but feel free to merge.

[njgheorghita]

@davesque thanks! i was thinking more on what information to include in the documentation - but also the file type. My thinking is if we want to encourage writing / linking documentation then a standard of what information is "recommended" to include might help. But, i'm also not sure if this is really worth "encouraging" and should be entirely left up to the package creator

[gnidan]

What are your thoughts about updating the style conventions to match the Solidity Style Guide

(ie. camelcase, uppercase contracts, etc.)

[njgheorghita]

@gnidan Yeah, definitely. Updating now

[davesque]

I wonder if some of the improper stylistic elements were transferred from the solidity documentation here: https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/develop/contracts.html#function-modifiers ?

[njgheorghita]

@gnidan @davesque Most likely - I'd be surprised if all the code throughout the solidity docs are in line with the style guide. Holler if I missed something