Closed gnidan closed 6 years ago
@gnidan nice! I like "package manifest specification" => "package manifest". Should we just get rid of "specification" altogether? like throughout docs/source/package-spec.rst
Should we just get rid of "specification" altogether?
@njgheorghita I don't think it's redundant - the Package Manifest Specification specifies the format for package manifests. If anything, I'd suggest removing the word "manifest", since we refer to "package manifest" as just "package" in a bunch of places. I didn't do that here because this part of the documentation is low-level, so it seems prudent to be explicit.
@gnidan Ok I see your point, I'm not married to using "manifest", I think the only reason it stuck around was because "manifest_version" is used in spec/package.spec.json
. So i'd be open to changing that to spec_version
or something else? ( i think package_version
might get a little confusing as individual packages will have their own versions) and deprecating "package manifest" for just "package" everywhere
Thanks for the approve! Let's discuss terminology in the channel or somewhere.
ℹ️ View this PR on the world wide web