Something I've been thinking about since the library got into link reference land is whether we can come up with less confusing names for things.
We don't have to use the same names for things as the spec does....
I'm thinking about this in the context of link_references and link_dependencies. I pretty much always have to think about which is which and even then, I'm regularly not 100% sure I'm right. Maybe we could rename those to something like:
Contract.unlinked_references
Contract.linked_references
Probably some better names out there if any other wordsmiths want to take a stab at this.
Something I've been thinking about since the library got into link reference land is whether we can come up with less confusing names for things.
We don't have to use the same names for things as the spec does....
I'm thinking about this in the context of
link_references
andlink_dependencies
. I pretty much always have to think about which is which and even then, I'm regularly not 100% sure I'm right. Maybe we could rename those to something like:Contract.unlinked_references
Contract.linked_references
Probably some better names out there if any other wordsmiths want to take a stab at this.