Closed ethul closed 9 years ago
Seems like a reasonable approach. Leaves all the heavy lifting up to ContT
. It does mean that the lower-level promise interface is not particularly useful, but that's probably fine.
Thanks for taking a look. Good points. I've made the changes you suggested. Good catches.
I think this might work for a start. I am open to improvements and additional suggestions on this.
Working on an implementation for composing promises using
ErrorT
andContT
. Based on discussions in issue #18 and pull request #20.@dylex any thoughts on this?