Closed lsorgi closed 1 year ago
I faced a similar issue. What you can do instead is provide a measure of the asynchronization. AFAIK, Kalibr does do approximate synchronization if the topics are not synchronized.
You can pass the tolerance for approximate synchronization:
--approx-sync MAX_DELTA_APPROXSYNC Time tolerance for approximate image synchronization [s] (default: 0.02)
To identify the time difference, you can use rostopic delay
which will give you delays between sequential ROS messages for a topic (NOT between multiple topics)
You can also increase the number of iterations, or include more images of your target in the overlap of the two cameras.
thx!
thx!
Hello, have you successfully calibrated the unsynchronized stereo camera with the above method? Or hardware alignment was eventually adopted? Looking at your camera model, do you use a fisheye camera?
Hi! I use fisheye camera models and we eventually synchronized the cameras
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Aug 2024, at 17:15, sun421-cloud @.***> wrote:
thx!
Hello, have you successfully calibrated the unsynchronized stereo camera with the above method? Or hardware alignment was eventually adopted? Looking at your camera model, do you use a fisheye camera?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Hello!
I am having issues calibrating a system with 2 non-synchronized cameras with divergent optical axis, i.e. with only ~30% of the field of view overlap.
If I run the intrinsic calibration of both cameras independently it works correctly, undistorsion look good, metrics good, all good. Commands for intrinsic calibration is
If I run the calibration of both cameras simultaneously it fails, not being able to correctly initialize the stereo pairs.
The command for stereo calibration is
I naively assumed that the temporal offset between the cameras was handled by the tool... is it not the case? do the 2 camera stream need to be strictly synchronized?