Closed kostrzewa closed 5 years ago
ping
this is -- in my opinion -- very important!
ping
-- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/etmc/tmLQCD/issues/395#issuecomment-325108037
Carsten Urbach e-mail: curbach@gmx.de urbach@hiskp.uni-bonn.de Fon : +49 (0)228 73 2379 skype : carsten.urbach URL: http://www.carsten-urbach.eu
Sorry but the DDalphaAMG_nd is not ready yet for being merged.
I've still some things to fix and improve.
I would prefer the opposite: that qphix_hmc_devel
is merged to the master and then I will add my changes. I don't think the two part overlap, or?
Otherwise I think it will be ready in the next week or so.
Okay, fine. I've made quite a number of changes to various solver interfaces and would like to start production on Marconi ASAP. But I can begin with the ND doublet without DDalphaAMG and move to the DDalphaAMG-accelerated multi-shift later.
I do believe there might be some overlap in the monomial_solve wrappers for the heavy doublet and monomial_solve in general.
No problem for solving the conflicts. I'm sorry for not pushing it now, but otherwise I would have to do additional pull requests after. We did some more improvements recently but they are not definitive yet. The speed-up for the rational approximation should be higher than what is now.
Okay, I think we can close this as we are making progress.
@sbacchio, @Finkenrath, @urbach : I would like to merge the production version of the
DDalphaAMG_nd
branch with myqphix_hmc_devel
branch to then proceed to pull-request into etmc/master. Does this correspond to the actual production version? https://github.com/Finkenrath/tmLQCD/commits/DDalphaAMG_nd