etmc / tmLQCD

tmLQCD is a freely available software suite providing a set of tools to be used in lattice QCD simulations. This is mainly a HMC implementation (including PHMC and RHMC) for Wilson, Wilson Clover and Wilson twisted mass fermions and inverter for different versions of the Dirac operator. The code is fully parallelised and ships with optimisations for various modern architectures, such as commodity PC clusters and the Blue Gene family.
http://www.itkp.uni-bonn.de/~urbach/software.html
GNU General Public License v3.0
32 stars 47 forks source link

merge of DDalphaAMG_nd and qphix_hmc_devel branches for merge into master #395

Closed kostrzewa closed 5 years ago

kostrzewa commented 6 years ago

@sbacchio, @Finkenrath, @urbach : I would like to merge the production version of the DDalphaAMG_nd branch with my qphix_hmc_devel branch to then proceed to pull-request into etmc/master. Does this correspond to the actual production version? https://github.com/Finkenrath/tmLQCD/commits/DDalphaAMG_nd

kostrzewa commented 6 years ago

ping

urbach commented 6 years ago

this is -- in my opinion -- very important!

ping

-- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/etmc/tmLQCD/issues/395#issuecomment-325108037

Carsten Urbach e-mail: curbach@gmx.de urbach@hiskp.uni-bonn.de Fon : +49 (0)228 73 2379 skype : carsten.urbach URL: http://www.carsten-urbach.eu

sbacchio commented 6 years ago

Sorry but the DDalphaAMG_nd is not ready yet for being merged. I've still some things to fix and improve. I would prefer the opposite: that qphix_hmc_devel is merged to the master and then I will add my changes. I don't think the two part overlap, or? Otherwise I think it will be ready in the next week or so.

kostrzewa commented 6 years ago

Okay, fine. I've made quite a number of changes to various solver interfaces and would like to start production on Marconi ASAP. But I can begin with the ND doublet without DDalphaAMG and move to the DDalphaAMG-accelerated multi-shift later.

kostrzewa commented 6 years ago

I do believe there might be some overlap in the monomial_solve wrappers for the heavy doublet and monomial_solve in general.

sbacchio commented 6 years ago

No problem for solving the conflicts. I'm sorry for not pushing it now, but otherwise I would have to do additional pull requests after. We did some more improvements recently but they are not definitive yet. The speed-up for the rational approximation should be higher than what is now.

kostrzewa commented 5 years ago

Okay, I think we can close this as we are making progress.