Closed schinery closed 1 year ago
👍🏼 makes sense. let's see what the CI says.
@schinery I've fixed the issue with failing workflow tests. If you can rebase against master and push up again we can see if tests pass.
EDIT: Nevermind, looks like you got it.
@schinery IIRC rbsecp256k1/rbsecp256k1
refers to the shared object found in the rbsecp256k1
library folder, not a Ruby file, so it cannot be simply removed and I don't think the issue is simply an invalid import.
@etscrivner ah yeah, seems like that 😢
@etscrivner I'll close this and do a PR just for updating the test matrix
Fix for https://github.com/etscrivner/rbsecp256k1/issues/61 which I've tested in my previously failing app using
gem "rbsecp256k1", git: "https://github.com/schinery/rbsecp256k1"
.Also updated the test matrix to include Ruby 3.1 and 3.2.