Closed dzarras closed 7 months ago
We can implement this put it is of low priority. In several specifications the new requirement (not recommendation) is to use type specific JWTs to avoid hijacking. Some examples :
openid4vci-proof+jwt
kb+jwt
I believe this issue was duplicated by #186 Given that #186 is closed, we can close this as well. Right?
As per https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9101#name-cross-jwt-confusion it is a strong recommendation to use the
Content-Type
HTTP Headerapplication/oauth-authz-req+jwt
and set thetyp
claim tooauth-authz-req+jwt
for JAR.To increase compatibility with Authorization Servers that work only with untyped JWTs we should:
Content-Type
application/jwt
andapplication/json
typ
jwt
ornull