Feedback to story on Alpine flash floods

[Peter9192]

The story on Alpine flash floods received attention from users, and they've been kind enough to provide some comments.

• The "Methodology" page is a bit unclear at some points, particularly:
  • Why were two different ERA reanalysis datasets used?
  • What is the period for ERA5?
  • Why were two overlapping, but different periods used for "climate model" and "current climate"?
• Sometimes there is some technical language with unexplained abbreviations (e.g. WP3)
• The "Results - frequency" page is a bit unclear. Both x and y axis seem to show the likelihood of threshold exceedance, but using different notifications (e.g. 9.9*10^-1 instead of 99%). The difference between the x and y axis, and the meaning of the horizontal red and green lines is not clear.
• It would be helpful if the references are presented as text rather than as image, and perhaps they can be place on a separate page?

Would it be possible to update the storyboards based on (some of) these comments, or can we provide an answer here? I'd be happy to help implement the changes.

[Peter9192]

Project finished with latest version of stories.