Open avodonosov opened 2 years ago
Is that intentional that in the first example the cffi-function is duplicated by the macro-node and in the second - by function-node?
This is probably an artifact of how parsing works.
Is that also intentional?
No, I certainly forgot to write the tests.
For example:
Is that intentional that in the first example the cffi-function is duplicated by the
macro-node
and in the second - byfunction-node
?BTW,
cffi-function
and other cffi nodes havenil
printed representation - as defined at https://github.com/eudoxia0/docparser/blob/fc35b2a927df22a29141057c156f3902f30ac830/src/print.lisp#L46.That is confusing when inspecting query results or printing them. For example
M-x slime-inspect
for this formLooks like that in SLIME:
Is that also intentional?