Open PMSeitzer opened 4 years ago
If nothing else, it would be good to add some comments to the code (for example, what type of correlation is being computed?)
Sometimes the score is > 1. This is starting to affect other applications, such as SEC Proteomics.
mzUtils::correlation()
appears to be returning too good of a score. The values do not agree withPearson
,Spearman
, orKendall
correlation coefficients implemented inR
. This is probably a bug, and will have downstream effects, for example onmzDeltas
inmass_spec
and in themaven
GUI (peak picking, peak clustering , etc).