Closed ShawnZhong closed 7 months ago
Thanks a lot!
@ShawnZhong @Officeyutong By the way, is it possible to make a GitHub Action for testing bpftime on arm64?
@ShawnZhong @Officeyutong By the way, is it possible to make a GitHub Action for testing bpftime on arm64?
Many of features existing rely on x86, e.g user space syscall trace. We need a new syscall trace trampoline on arm64.
@ShawnZhong @Officeyutong By the way, is it possible to make a GitHub Action for testing bpftime on arm64?
Running tests itself is relatively easier
Many of features existing rely on x86, e.g user space syscall trace. We need a new syscall trace trampoline on arm64.
That's fine. At least we can get the uprobe and runtime work. We can get this PR work first, and then consider others(syscall trace, CI, syscall trace should be easier on arm)
Is there any other features rely on x86?
@ShawnZhong @Officeyutong By the way, is it possible to make a GitHub Action for testing bpftime on arm64?
It seems that Arm-based hosted runners are still in public beta as of January 2024: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-10-30-accelerate-your-ci-cd-with-arm-based-hosted-runners-in-github-actions/
One option is to use self-hosted runners, which requires some setup (and cost money)
My least favorable option is to run inside QEMU.
Thanks a lot!
Many of features existing rely on x86, e.g user space syscall trace. We need a new syscall trace trampoline on arm64.
That's fine. At least we can get the uprobe and runtime work. We can get this PR work first, and then consider others(syscall trace, CI, syscall trace should be easier on arm)
Is there any other features rely on x86?
Calling original syscall at prog array implementation was bound to x86, needs updating
Description
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Configuration:
Checklist