Closed chenju2k6 closed 4 years ago
Sorry for the delay!
The logs that you posted in #12 suggest that we're incorrectly trying to extend an 80-bit integer to a 64-bit integer. Making the operation a truncation fixes the bitcode, but I'm not sure it's the right thing to do semantically - I suppose we'd lose information. Maybe we should instead introduce a way to pass big integers to the backend. I'll reproduce the issue locally to have a closer look at the bitcode...
Signed-off-by: Chen Ju chenju2k6@gmail.com