Open gmaze opened 2 months ago
poke: @laurcopp !
I think this would be a nice gimmick, but I wouldn't see it as a priority. First, I'd think, the BGC data access and interactions need to be(come) robust. E.g. I'd prioritize BGC-traj data access (-> think of PPOX_DOXY in air data, or parking drift phase BBP time series) over this.
I think this would be a nice gimmick, but I wouldn't see it as a priority.
surely not a priority, but a very good use-case to proof-test how we can bring BGC regression methods to argopy. CANYON-B on target.
I'd prioritize BGC-traj data access
This was raised recently here (#332 ) and we talked about this in LOV with @Sauzede I would need to first understand how these data are being used
@HCBScienceProducts you can make the case for traj files in here: https://github.com/euroargodev/argopy/discussions/214#discussioncomment-2659566
Good job @gmaze ! Thanks a lot
Contemplating to bring CANYON-B to argopy
There is a nice Python code written by @MarineFou and @fricour see fork here: https://github.com/euroargodev/CANYON-MED
Few comments:
argopy/related
sub-moduleargopy/static/assets
folderargo
accessor could make this easy to use, the API could look like this:After this, the xarray dataset would have the predicted variables added !
This could be a first step toward bringing CANYON-B to argopy as well.
poke: @Sauzede @catsch @HCBScienceProducts