Paper: Py3DFreeHandUS: a library for voxel-array reconstruction using Ultrasonography and attitude sensors (Davide-Monari)

[u0078867]

Dear editors,

Please find our contribution to the proceedings of Euroscipy 2014. See you in Cambridge. I will be able to read feedbacks and push updates after 25th August.

Best regards, Davide Monari

[pdebuyl]

Hi Davide,

Thank you for your submission! Please consider fixing the encoding (see https://github.com/u0078867/euroscipy_proceedings/pull/1 ).

Your submission is already considered submitted properly though, no problem with that :-)

[rc]

Hi, I will review the paper. I am not a specialist in this field, but I am interested in biomechanics and similar disciplines where such data are needed.

[u0078867]

Hi,

Perfect, thanks!

Davide

[almarklein]

I did a review. Very interesting topic and clearly explained. I would love to see some validation of the method, but I understand this is still early days. Apart from the nitpicking I am happy :)

[u0078867]

Thanks Almar! Yes, we are still in the eraly stage of this PhD project, but we are committed in improving protocol, algorithms and code as well of course :)

[almarklein]

One small tip in general: you could stress the benefit of your method a bit more: cost effective and safe - MRI is very expensive and CT radiation is a big issue.

[u0078867]

Will do, thanks for the tip!

[rc]

I did my review - it is a very interesting paper and approach. Besides the typos and details mentioned above, and Almar's recommendations, I have a few comments:

• The figures should be referenced in the text at appropriate places, maybe with some more details on their content.
• I understand that it is an early stage of the project, but in case you have some speed/quality/etc. comparison with any of the other existing applications, mention them in Preliminary results.

[u0078867]

Perfect Robert, thanks a lot for you review and tips as well! Will adjust the file in the coming days and commit.

[u0078867]

Ok, upgraded with your comments.

[pdebuyl]

Dear @almarklein and @rc , thank you for your reviews.

As Davide @u0078867 has updated the manuscript, may you confirm that the updates address satisfactorily your reviews?

Thanks, Pierre

[almarklein]

LGTM

[rc]

Thanks @u0078867 for the updates. Besides the few comments I had to the commit there is one more detail. Cite, please, the figures, instead of, for example

i.e. convex hull (:ref:`convhull`) ...

by

i.e. convex hull, see Figure :ref:`convhull`, ...

IMHO by (number) one usually references the equations. @pdebuyl, should the figures be referenced by Fig. or Figure or?

Otherwise OK!

Cheers, r.

[pdebuyl]

Starting a sentence:

Figure :ref:`figref` is pretty.

In a sentence:

As seen in Fig. :ref:`figref`, etc.

[u0078867]

Upgraded with your suggestions

[rc]

Looks good to me! The following are just extremely nit-picking notes, that you can ignore :):

• Maybe add a comma after the equation?
• (It is a rst feature that after an equation the text is always indented. Or can it be prevented by some LaTeX-specific mark-up?)
• It might help the reader to use the "same" notation in the equation and the algorithm, so that it is clear that e.g. ^{C}T_{T} is phTw(?) etc.

[u0078867]

Hi,

• comma added
• I tried, but it wasnt succesful, I am all ears about this :)
• now equation, code and image have all the same notation.

Davide

[rc]

Thanks, no more comments :)

[pdebuyl]

Thanks all, the review for this paper is considered over. I will check the layout across all papers before merging, though.

Pierre