Open oalders opened 8 years ago
It's a good idea. Unfortunately it's implemented by adding files to each repository. That would modify the data that we're archiving. :( Putting it into .github/
is a bit less odious, but still violates the basic idea of Gitpan as an archive.
I would suggest that making it clear (even going so far as adding a README.md linking to metacpan for the module if one doesn't exist) would help save a lot of people's time.
An archive can have additional information added to it without it being compromised, as long as the additional information is documented as such.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:46:24AM -0700, Leo Lapworth wrote:
I would suggest that making it clear (even going so far as adding a README.md linking to metacpan for the module if one doesn't exist) would help save a lot of people's time.
An archive can have additional information added to it without it being compromised, as long as the additional information is documented as such.
Instead of adding the README.md to the files (I expect this could cause problems with distributions that ship a README.md?), what about putting the README alone on the master branch (so that everyone would see it when browsing github), with instructions about a cpan (gitpan?) branch which would contain the history, unchanged.
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
As you search for youth, take care that it is not passing you by. (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #93 (Epic))
This might be a good way to prevent pull requests: https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates