Forte proofs corrections

[fevangelista]

Please list your corrections here in this format: E.g.

• [ ] Line 119, insert a comma after "method"
• [ ] Line 140, fix typo: "obital" -> "orbital"

[kannon92]

My ORCID is 0009-0001-7840-1117 (can confirm via https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7840-1117).

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 1337, should A. Eugene DePrince III be A. E. DePrince III?

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 1402 should be A. E. DePrince III

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 1426 should be D. Van Neck (?)

[shuhangli98]

• [x] Line 56, line 293, coupled cluster -> coupled-cluster.
• [x] line 295, block diagonal -> block-diagonal
• [x] line 305, add E_h^{-2} after 0. (FAE: not necessary)
• [ ] line 314, second quantized -> second-quantized

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 1474, PRX Quantum is not clickable

[brianz98]

In general should the Big-O notation be \mathcal{O} instead of roman O?

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 674, on a typical single CPU node might be changed to on a single typical CPU node or on a typical single-CPU node

[brianz98]

• [x] Lines 703-706, can the listing be single-column?

[brianz98]

All listings can be a little more compact

[brianz98]

• [x] Lines 1122 and 1124 (eq. 43) are inconsistent: line 1122 defines \hat{T}_{\mu} but eq. 43 uses \hat{\mathcal{T}}_{\mu}. Should both be \hat{\tau}_{\mu}? In which case eq. 44 should also be changed (line 1127).

[brianz98]

• [ ] Line 1140, functionality -> functionalities?

[brianz98]

• [x] Line 1154, can our 4c paper be cited? (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01372)

[huangm29]

• [x] Line 474, should the Bagel package be noted with\textsc? It is capitalized on the original paper.
• [x] Line 882, should the Psi4 be used with -\textsc?
• [x] Line 1037, I would add a "both" before Na+ to clarify.

[marink2]

• [x] Line 1046, "multi-reference" -> "multireference" (multireference is used everywhere else)
• [x] Line 1099, "multi-reference" -> "multireference" (multireference is used everywhere else)

[marink2]

• [x] Line 677, include citation to pyscf [10.1002/wcms.1340]

[fevangelista]

• [x] 28
• [x] 98
• [x] 101
• [x] 109
• [x] 122

[lcyyork]

• [x] Line 325, I would put M after the "model space" at line 324.
• [x] Line 329, u appears to be active indices in the previous sections. Maybe change index label?
• [x] Line 359-361, perhaps I missed it or unnecessary, but N_C, N_A, N_V are not defined.
• [x] Line 377, N is undefined.
• [x] Line 398, N is undefined and M indicates model space previously.
• [x] Line 579, remove "[Eq. (6)]".

[loriab]

• [x] In my affiliation, remove a school. CDS has a joint appointment there: "Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, ~School of Computational Science and Engineering,~ Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA"
• [x] my ORCID is good
• [x] Line 59, "generate" -> "generalize" ?
• [x] Line 510, should "orbitals in A (NA)" be N subscript A?
• [x] Line 716, "strings" -> "string" ?

This is through page 12. Will resume later.

[loriab]

• [x] Line 1083 "argument" -> "arguments"

Those are all the typos I found.

---

In case it's useful in future, I like the below for code. Shows up in JCP like the attached.

% * (c) Snippet
%       * can be referenced
%       * can be captioned
%       * independent numbering sequence
%       * space after `Snippet ` to separate numbering
%       * in document header, `\usepackage{float}`
%       * once per doc, `\floatstyle{plain}` (looks like figure) or `ruled` (looks like table)
%       * once per doc, `\newfloat{Snippet }{H}{lop}` to define the snippet
%
\begin{Snippet }
{\footnotesize
\begin{verbatim}
...stuff...
\end{verbatim}
}%
\caption{XXXX\label{snip:XXXX}}
\end{Snippet }