Closed davy closed 10 years ago
I think we'd be fine to add an IPSJob
class and return it. We can bump this to 2.0 to indicate we made an API change. I doubt many people are using that return value anyway, most people just let the ips
block print stuff out.
@davy How about you make the bigger changes you wanted (better namespacing, better return values) then I'll merge this and we can release it as 2.0!
@evanphx great, will do!
Refactoring
Benchmark.ips
besides simplyBenchmark.ips(time, warmup)
. Documented in README. Added tests.Updated Namespacing
Updated Class Hierarchy
IPS::Job
, splitIPS::Job
into it's own fileIPS::Report
into it's own fileIPS::Report
toIPS::Report::Entry
, createdIPS::Report
IPS::Report
To Do