Closed RenatusRo closed 1 week ago
We already have charges and taxes. Aren't they sufficient? What tariff are we even talking about here?
At least Margin is missing:
AFAIK now it is
func (t *embed) totalPrice(price float64) float64 {
return (price + t.Charges) * (1 + t.Tax)
}
for grid we would need
func (t *embed) totalPrice(price float64) float64 {
return ((t.Margin* price + t.Charges) * (1 + t.Tax)) + t.MoreFees
}
t.Margin, t.Charges being specific for grid. o.k, t.MoreFees could be calculated into t.Charges
and for feedin
func (t *embed) totalPrice(price float64) float64 {
return ((t.Margin* price + t.Charges)
}
t.Margin, t.Charges being specific for feedin
I don't understand:
What tariff are we even talking about here?
exactly, charges as percentage and non-taxable uplifts. ( https://trevion.be/tariefkaarten/ )
I tend to revert this and replace this PR with the ability to define an arbitrary formula (using Go syntax):
math.Abs(price) * 1.19 + 0.32
If we do that we need to understand which and how many variables need to go into that formula and if the variables are fixed or zone-based (see https://github.com/evcc-io/evcc/issues/16829).
As tariffs are trending today yet another perspective:
None of the Belgian energy companies provides an API. Prices are given as formulas based on the belpex market index X
The final grid: price/kWh then becomes
(marginA * X + marginB + various_fees) * VATaxThing + MoreFees
MoreFees being a composition of capacity tariff + fixed provider fee broken down to an estimation per kWh based on year demand an average capacity.
Describe the solution you'd like
A possibility to describe a tariff formula based on entsoe.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The current entsoe/charges/tax gives a good start but stays a bit off the reality. And using @VolkerK62 nice life hack https://github.com/evcc-io/evcc/discussions/16465#discussioncomment-10839844 looks cumbersome. Of course I could build a day ahead price array myself outside evcc and do a
type: custom
to myself.