Closed ste-ta closed 3 years ago
Sorry for not having a better replay to a good issue: at this time support for additional chargers is not a priority.
Letting alone the fact that I personally would not want a cloud-based API for my home charger, I cannot currently spend the time for implementing and supporting an additional charger. If the vendor wants to fund this on a regular basis he is welcome.
I'd also accept PRs if you would volunteer to take over providing the required support.
Die Cloud-API fällt wohl erwartungsgemäß regelmäig aus. Wer hätte das nur geahnt...? https://easee.upvoty.com/b/ideas/local-simple-api
Aber es sieht zumindest auf den ersten flüchtigen Blick so aus als könnte man auch lokal etwas steuern: https://github.com/andersalavik/easee-ha/
Hi,
I would have a quick questions here. I see that the feature request for EASEE support is closed. On the other hand I see that there is a feature/easee brach available in the project which already contains quite some code and was even changed until a month ago. How much is there already implemented and how much would be left here? I am not too deep into developing, but does it make sense pull this and make it work for my own usage?
Hi,
I am a user of an Easee Wallbox that can be controlled via APP and API. I already have an HomeAssistant integration but would love to use it together with EVCC. The wallbox supports variable currents from 6-32 A as well as remote adoption of phases to be used. There is a python wrapper library thats wraps the easee api so integration should be straightforward.
Info Easee https://easee-international.com/de/zuhause-laden/
Easee API: https://api.easee.cloud/index.html
Python wrapper: https://pypi.org/project/easee/
Documentation: https://fondberg.github.io/pyeasee/pyeasee/