Mandate restriction to certain actions

[londoss]

Conceptual models and other processes should contained that Mandates can be restricted not only to time but also to certain actions. For example, I (madator) give the mandate to my lawyer (mandatee) to sign the contract (or to replace me in the inheritance proceedings) without any time limit, but the mandate ends after the inheritance proceedings ends.

[everis-rpam]

Very good point @londoss. We are already taking this aspect into consideration for the improvement of the RPaM data model.

Many thanks for this contribution.

[rollikai]

In Finland we have also thought about this use case, but found it rather difficult to solve. The problem is that in order to be able make specific mandates related to eg. certain specific contracts the mandator would have to be aware of that specific contract and its ID at the time when he is issuing the mandate. That would mean the contract need to be existing before that mandate is issued. However, we have added a possibility for mandator to define restrictions to specific mandate. For examble if the mandate code is "Contract issues" then the restriction would not be the specific contract id but id of the other party of the contract which the mandator already knows.

[everis-rpam]

Thank you for the inputs, @rollikai, @londoss. It is very useful that we identify these use cases in every MS because they provide insight on the data elements that may be necessary in the data model. The very first impact of this thread of discussion has been that we have a new constraint "OneSingleUse" and a proposal of "exchange protocol" with three messages Request-Response-Notification that are now documentation for its presentation and discussion in the WG meetings.

[paulakeen]

Please see examples on how the OneSingleUse constraint have been implemented in the comments for Issue #1.

[everis-rpam]

Have you ever identified the situation where the mandate is valid for a limited number of uses? not only one, say ... 10 times?