Closed ItsMeBrianD closed 11 months ago
Latest commit: d000ae0318c33768a3bb7f3fb6df32202ffafb5b
The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
evidence-development-workspace | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | May 30, 2023 2:31pm |
evidence-docs | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | May 30, 2023 2:31pm |
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | d000ae0318c33768a3bb7f3fb6df32202ffafb5b |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/evidence-development-workspace/deploys/6476086ec4e3330009104a53 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-812--evidence-development-workspace.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
@ItsMeBrianD What does this need? More review?
@archiewood I think one more pass; but everything should be good to go here
I can test if you need, what's the ideal protocol?
Essentially; the updated docs have all the "correct" environment variables, those should work without any warnings, using "existing" environment variables (e.g. ones that aren't EVIDENCE
scoped), should log a warning stating that they are deprecated.
there are all only used in production though, so I assume I need to test a deployment with different permutations of the above variables them?
And read the deployment logs
Okay so using:
I'm getting:
Should I also be getting warnings about?
I notice that DUCKDB_FILENAME is not marked as deprecated, so perhaps this is as you intended?
When using:
I get no warnings, and a successful build, as expected
DUCKDB_GITIGNORE_DUCKDB
I don't know if this environment variable is used anywhere; I searched through the project and didn't find anything.
DUCKDB_FILENAME
This was not flagged as deprecated; we can change that if we'd like to
there are all only used in production though, so I assume I need to test a deployment with different permutations of the above variables them?
It could be done this way, or you can build locally;
If you create a .env
file with export SOME_ENV_VAR=SOME_ENV_VALUE
, then run . .env
, that will load the environment variables, you should be able to use npm run build
and it will behave like a production build
This was not flagged as deprecated; we can change that if we'd like to Not sure it's that important
I'm done on this from my side
Description
Resolves #724
Checklist