evilz / vscode-reveal

Revealjs vsCode extension
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=evilz.vscode-reveal
MIT License
460 stars 147 forks source link

Bump esbuild from 0.14.47 to 0.15.10 #1096

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 years ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 years ago

Bumps esbuild from 0.14.47 to 0.15.10.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.15.10

  • Add support for node's "pattern trailers" syntax (#2569)

    After esbuild implemented node's exports feature in package.json, node changed the feature to also allow text after * wildcards in patterns. Previously the * was required to be at the end of the pattern. It lets you do something like this:

    {
      "exports": {
        "./features/*": "./features/*.js",
        "./features/*.js": "./features/*.js"
      }
    }
    

    With this release, esbuild now supports these types of patterns too.

  • Fix subpath imports with Yarn PnP (#2545)

    Node has a little-used feature called subpath imports which are package-internal imports that start with # and that go through the imports map in package.json. Previously esbuild had a bug that caused esbuild to not handle these correctly in packages installed via Yarn's "Plug'n'Play" installation strategy. The problem was that subpath imports were being checked after Yarn PnP instead of before. This release reorders these checks, which should allow subpath imports to work in this case.

  • Link from JS to CSS in the metafile (#1861, #2565)

    When you import CSS into a bundled JS file, esbuild creates a parallel CSS bundle next to your JS bundle. So if app.ts imports some CSS files and you bundle it, esbuild will give you app.js and app.css. You would then add both <script src="app.js"></script> and <link href="app.css" rel="stylesheet"> to your HTML to include everything in the page. This approach is more efficient than having esbuild insert additional JavaScript into app.js that downloads and includes app.css because it means the browser can download and parse both the CSS and the JS in parallel (and potentially apply the CSS before the JS has even finished downloading).

    However, sometimes it's difficult to generate the <link> tag. One case is when you've added [hash] to the entry names setting to include a content hash in the file name. Then the file name will look something like app-GX7G2SBE.css and may change across subsequent builds. You can tell esbuild to generate build metadata using the metafile API option but the metadata only tells you which generated JS bundle corresponds to a JS entry point (via the entryPoint property), not which file corresponds to the associated CSS bundle. Working around this was hacky and involved string manipulation.

    This release adds the cssBundle property to the metafile to make this easier. It's present on the metadata for the generated JS bundle and points to the associated CSS bundle. So to generate the HTML tags for a given JS entry point, you first find the output file with the entryPoint you are looking for (and put that in a <script> tag), then check for the cssBundle property to find the associated CSS bundle (and put that in a <link> tag).

    One thing to note is that there is deliberately no jsBundle property mapping the other way because it's not a 1:1 relationship. Two JS bundles can share the same CSS bundle in the case where the associated CSS bundles have the same name and content. In that case there would be no one value for a hypothetical jsBundle property to have.

v0.15.9

  • Fix an obscure npm package installation issue with --omit=optional (#2558)

    The previous release introduced a regression with npm install esbuild --omit=optional where the file node_modules/.bin/esbuild would no longer be present after installation. That could cause any package scripts which used the esbuild command to no longer work. This release fixes the regression so node_modules/.bin/esbuild should now be present again after installation. This regression only affected people installing esbuild using npm with either the --omit=optional or --no-optional flag, which is a somewhat unusual situation.

    More details:

    The reason for this regression is due to some obscure npm implementation details. Since the Go compiler doesn't support trivial cross-compiling on certain Android platforms, esbuild's installer installs a WebAssembly shim on those platforms instead. In the previous release I attempted to simplify esbuild's WebAssembly shims to depend on the esbuild-wasm package instead of including another whole copy of the WebAssembly binary (to make publishing faster and to save on file system space after installation). However, both the esbuild package and the esbuild-wasm package provide a binary called esbuild and it turns out that adding esbuild-wasm as a nested dependency of the esbuild package (specifically esbuild optionally depends on @esbuild/android-arm which depends on esbuild-wasm) caused npm to be confused about what node_modules/.bin/esbuild is supposed to be.

    It's pretty strange and unexpected that disabling the installation of optional dependencies altogether would suddenly cause an optional dependency's dependency to conflict with the top-level package. What happens under the hood is that if --omit=optional is present, npm attempts to uninstall the esbuild-wasm nested dependency at the end of npm install (even though the esbuild-wasm package was never installed due to --omit=optional). This uninstallation causes node_modules/.bin/esbuild to be deleted.

    After doing a full investigation, I discovered that npm's handling of the .bin directory is deliberately very brittle. When multiple packages in the dependency tree put something in .bin with the same name, the end result is non-deterministic/random. What you get in .bin might be from one package, from the other package, or might be missing entirely. The workaround suggested by npm is to just avoid having two packages that put something in .bin with the same name. So this was fixed by making the @esbuild/android-arm and esbuild-android-64 packages each include another whole copy of the WebAssembly binary, which works because these packages don't put anything in .bin.

v0.15.8

  • Fix JSX name collision edge case (#2534)

    Code generated by esbuild could have a name collision in the following edge case:

    • The JSX transformation mode is set to automatic, which causes import statements to be inserted
    • An element uses a {...spread} followed by a key={...}, which uses the legacy createElement fallback imported from react

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.15.10

  • Add support for node's "pattern trailers" syntax (#2569)

    After esbuild implemented node's exports feature in package.json, node changed the feature to also allow text after * wildcards in patterns. Previously the * was required to be at the end of the pattern. It lets you do something like this:

    {
      "exports": {
        "./features/*": "./features/*.js",
        "./features/*.js": "./features/*.js"
      }
    }
    

    With this release, esbuild now supports these types of patterns too.

  • Fix subpath imports with Yarn PnP (#2545)

    Node has a little-used feature called subpath imports which are package-internal imports that start with # and that go through the imports map in package.json. Previously esbuild had a bug that caused esbuild to not handle these correctly in packages installed via Yarn's "Plug'n'Play" installation strategy. The problem was that subpath imports were being checked after Yarn PnP instead of before. This release reorders these checks, which should allow subpath imports to work in this case.

  • Link from JS to CSS in the metafile (#1861, #2565)

    When you import CSS into a bundled JS file, esbuild creates a parallel CSS bundle next to your JS bundle. So if app.ts imports some CSS files and you bundle it, esbuild will give you app.js and app.css. You would then add both <script src="app.js"></script> and <link href="app.css" rel="stylesheet"> to your HTML to include everything in the page. This approach is more efficient than having esbuild insert additional JavaScript into app.js that downloads and includes app.css because it means the browser can download and parse both the CSS and the JS in parallel (and potentially apply the CSS before the JS has even finished downloading).

    However, sometimes it's difficult to generate the <link> tag. One case is when you've added [hash] to the entry names setting to include a content hash in the file name. Then the file name will look something like app-GX7G2SBE.css and may change across subsequent builds. You can tell esbuild to generate build metadata using the metafile API option but the metadata only tells you which generated JS bundle corresponds to a JS entry point (via the entryPoint property), not which file corresponds to the associated CSS bundle. Working around this was hacky and involved string manipulation.

    This release adds the cssBundle property to the metafile to make this easier. It's present on the metadata for the generated JS bundle and points to the associated CSS bundle. So to generate the HTML tags for a given JS entry point, you first find the output file with the entryPoint you are looking for (and put that in a <script> tag), then check for the cssBundle property to find the associated CSS bundle (and put that in a <link> tag).

    One thing to note is that there is deliberately no jsBundle property mapping the other way because it's not a 1:1 relationship. Two JS bundles can share the same CSS bundle in the case where the associated CSS bundles have the same name and content. In that case there would be no one value for a hypothetical jsBundle property to have.

0.15.9

  • Fix an obscure npm package installation issue with --omit=optional (#2558)

    The previous release introduced a regression with npm install esbuild --omit=optional where the file node_modules/.bin/esbuild would no longer be present after installation. That could cause any package scripts which used the esbuild command to no longer work. This release fixes the regression so node_modules/.bin/esbuild should now be present again after installation. This regression only affected people installing esbuild using npm with either the --omit=optional or --no-optional flag, which is a somewhat unusual situation.

    More details:

    The reason for this regression is due to some obscure npm implementation details. Since the Go compiler doesn't support trivial cross-compiling on certain Android platforms, esbuild's installer installs a WebAssembly shim on those platforms instead. In the previous release I attempted to simplify esbuild's WebAssembly shims to depend on the esbuild-wasm package instead of including another whole copy of the WebAssembly binary (to make publishing faster and to save on file system space after installation). However, both the esbuild package and the esbuild-wasm package provide a binary called esbuild and it turns out that adding esbuild-wasm as a nested dependency of the esbuild package (specifically esbuild optionally depends on @esbuild/android-arm which depends on esbuild-wasm) caused npm to be confused about what node_modules/.bin/esbuild is supposed to be.

    It's pretty strange and unexpected that disabling the installation of optional dependencies altogether would suddenly cause an optional dependency's dependency to conflict with the top-level package. What happens under the hood is that if --omit=optional is present, npm attempts to uninstall the esbuild-wasm nested dependency at the end of npm install (even though the esbuild-wasm package was never installed due to --omit=optional). This uninstallation causes node_modules/.bin/esbuild to be deleted.

    After doing a full investigation, I discovered that npm's handling of the .bin directory is deliberately very brittle. When multiple packages in the dependency tree put something in .bin with the same name, the end result is non-deterministic/random. What you get in .bin might be from one package, from the other package, or might be missing entirely. The workaround suggested by npm is to just avoid having two packages that put something in .bin with the same name. So this was fixed by making the @esbuild/android-arm and esbuild-android-64 packages each include another whole copy of the WebAssembly binary, which works because these packages don't put anything in .bin.

0.15.8

  • Fix JSX name collision edge case (#2534)

    Code generated by esbuild could have a name collision in the following edge case:

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 years ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

codecov[bot] commented 2 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #1096 (7c15b91) into master (1d2e60f) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1096   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.74%   50.74%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines         668      668           
  Branches       85       85           
=======================================
  Hits          339      339           
  Misses        257      257           
  Partials       72       72           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 50.74% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

dependabot[bot] commented 2 years ago

Superseded by #1111.