evilz / vscode-reveal

Revealjs vsCode extension
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=evilz.vscode-reveal
MIT License
460 stars 147 forks source link

Bump esbuild from 0.14.47 to 0.17.9 #1232

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 year ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Bumps esbuild from 0.14.47 to 0.17.9.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.17.9

  • Parse rest bindings in TypeScript types (#2937)

    Previously esbuild was unable to parse the following valid TypeScript code:

    let tuple: (...[e1, e2, ...es]: any) => any
    

    This release includes support for parsing code like this.

  • Fix TypeScript code translation for certain computed declare class fields (#2914)

    In TypeScript, the key of a computed declare class field should only be preserved if there are no decorators for that field. Previously esbuild always preserved the key, but esbuild will now remove the key to match the output of the TypeScript compiler:

    // Original code
    declare function dec(a: any, b: any): any
    declare const removeMe: unique symbol
    declare const keepMe: unique symbol
    class X {
        declare [removeMe]: any
        @dec declare [keepMe]: any
    }
    

    // Old output var _a; class X { } removeMe, _a = keepMe; __decorateClass([ dec ], X.prototype, _a, 2);

    // New output var _a; class X { } _a = keepMe; __decorateClass([ dec ], X.prototype, _a, 2);

  • Fix a crash with path resolution error generation (#2913)

    In certain situations, a module containing an invalid import path could previously cause esbuild to crash when it attempts to generate a more helpful error message. This crash has been fixed.

v0.17.8

  • Fix a minification bug with non-ASCII identifiers (#2910)

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

Changelog: 2022

This changelog documents all esbuild versions published in the year 2022 (versions 0.14.11 through 0.16.12).

0.16.12

  • Loader defaults to js for extensionless files (#2776)

    Certain packages contain files without an extension. For example, the yargs package contains the file yargs/yargs which has no extension. Node, Webpack, and Parcel can all understand code that imports yargs/yargs because they assume that the file is JavaScript. However, esbuild was previously unable to understand this code because it relies on the file extension to tell it how to interpret the file. With this release, esbuild will now assume files without an extension are JavaScript files. This can be customized by setting the loader for "" (the empty string, representing files without an extension) to another loader. For example, if you want files without an extension to be treated as CSS instead, you can do that like this:

    • CLI:

      esbuild --bundle --loader:=css
      
    • JS:

      esbuild.build({
        bundle: true,
        loader: { '': 'css' },
      })
      
    • Go:

      api.Build(api.BuildOptions{
        Bundle: true,
        Loader: map[string]api.Loader{"": api.LoaderCSS},
      })
      

    In addition, the "type" field in package.json files now only applies to files with an explicit .js, .jsx, .ts, or .tsx extension. Previously it was incorrectly applied by esbuild to all files that had an extension other than .mjs, .mts, .cjs, or .cts including extensionless files. So for example an extensionless file in a "type": "module" package is now treated as CommonJS instead of ESM.

0.16.11

  • Avoid a syntax error in the presence of direct eval (#2761)

    The behavior of nested function declarations in JavaScript depends on whether the code is run in strict mode or not. It would be problematic if esbuild preserved nested function declarations in its output because then the behavior would depend on whether the output was run in strict mode or not instead of respecting the strict mode behavior of the original source code. To avoid this, esbuild transforms nested function declarations to preserve the intended behavior of the original source code regardless of whether the output is run in strict mode or not:

    // Original code
    if (true) {
      function foo() {}
      console.log(!!foo)
      foo = null
      console.log(!!foo)
    }
    

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Merging #1232 (166dc69) into master (1d2e60f) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1232   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.74%   50.74%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines         668      668           
  Branches       85       85           
=======================================
  Hits          339      339           
  Misses        257      257           
  Partials       72       72           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 50.74% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Superseded by #1235.