Closed xu4wang closed 3 years ago
With the current implementation you will have to create several fields (photo1, photo2, photo3...). Ideally I would provide a way to specify "array fields" but it is not implemented.
With the current implementation you will have to create several fields (photo1, photo2, photo3...). Ideally I would provide a way to specify "array fields" but it is not implemented.
thanks for the clarification.
There will be two scenarios for "array fields",
Do you think we should implement the above two scenarios in one field? Or it should be two different "f.type"? I am new to evolutility but I'd like to contribute when I get some idea on how to do that.
The case (2) is implemented as field type "list". It is not used in the demo but in the test model. Case (1) would be nice to have. It is most useful for images but maybe could be done for all field types as a new property of fields.
The case (2) is implemented as field type "list". It is not used in the demo but in the test model. Case (1) would be nice to have. It is most useful for images but maybe could be done for all field types as a new property of fields.
thanks Will check "list".
Thanks for the amazing project. I like the idea very much, to be able to generate UI and DB automatically based on models.
One questions, from the example model in https://github.com/evoluteur/evolutility-ui-react
In the model of artist, the artist can only have one photo:
Is there a way I can adjust the model to support multiple photos(display & edit) for one artist?
BR,Xu