evsar3 / sshfs-win-manager

A GUI for SSHFS-Win (https://github.com/billziss-gh/sshfs-win)
MIT License
1.11k stars 84 forks source link

Simultaneous connections - spinning wheel #143

Open AdsarAdam opened 2 years ago

AdsarAdam commented 2 years ago

Hi - firstly - I love this tool, what a life-saver!

One tiny niggle. I have a couple of endpoints setup. When the tool first loads, the drives connect perfectly, but the UI struggles to update the status of both. Therefore one of the drives stays spinning so can't disconnect, etc.

image

niawag commented 2 years ago

Hi and thanks for this great tool too!

i'm facing the same issue than @AdsarAdam and would like to know if there is a solution/workaround for this. I'm running sshfs-win on an up to date win10 x64

evsar3 commented 2 years ago

Hello,

It's hapening in some system and I can't reproduce this on my computer, I will try to change some lines and release a Beta version, so you guys could help on testing it.

AdsarAdam commented 2 years ago

Yes, more than happy to test, thanks!

GrapeGummy commented 1 year ago

Hello, Im also experiencing this issue. I have 2 connections setup. When both settings for each connection are set to connect on startup. The top or first connection in the list is able to connect, but not the 2nd one. I have tried switching the order of connections and the top one connects, but the bottom one is unable to connect and shows an circling icon.

The setting reconnet on connection loss is not on. But I tried with this setting on for each connection and there is no difference in the outcome.

Settings for connections image

Setting for SSHFS-Win Manager Application level Settings image

What the connections look like at run. image

I also tried adding a delay-connection parameter in the 2nd connection on the list of connections and it did not work.

Hopefully some of this helps. I will be happy to assist as well.

Thank you! I would suspect a race condition with the two connections, perhaps with a callback. (Complete guess here, I have not looked at the code yet).