Closed moranegg closed 6 years ago
The mapping sounds good to me!
The only thing I might add is that you could also look into using Dublic Core Terms for some of the properties that DOAP doesn't have, like dates.
Nice work, thanks for sharing it! I can't find any immediate comments, except to back up what @kjetilk said: your publisher, for instance, has a Dublin Core analog which could be used in DOAP descriptions.
Hello,
I'm a research intern at Software Heritage which collects the source code of software projects from a variety of origins. The same source code can be collected from different origins, each providing potentially complementary or conflicting metadata describing the project of which this source code is part, and the people that take part in it.
As I was researching different software ontologies I discovered the CodeMeta initiative, where a crosswalk table of metadata standards keeps different vocabularies.
I think it's important to integrate DOAP into the CodeMeta table and I'll be glad to do so, but I would love your input on the translation between DOAP terms and CodeMeta terms:
Also, I was wondering if you have statistics about the usage of DOAP on Github or in general?
Cheers, Morane