Question about fence_scsi

[intentions]

Hello,

I've got a question about the fence_scsi, I have a similar setup to yours but instead of everything being in one big pool I have two pools that are supposed to be in an active-active configuration (so one pool being exported from each head unless there is a problem with one of the heads).

for the fence_scsi do I create two different stonith objects (one for each pool) or one big stonith object for both pools?

[ewwhite]

In this case, you would create multiple groups and associate a fence device with each pool.

You can set resource co-location constraints to pin each pool to the node you want, allowing failover of that workload to the other node.

 fence-vol1 (stonith:fence_scsi):   Started zfs3-node1
 Resource Group: group-vol1
     vol1   (ocf::heartbeat:ZFS):   Started zfs3-node1
     vol1-ip    (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):   Started zfs3-node1
 fence-vol2 (stonith:fence_scsi):   Started zfs3-node2
 Resource Group: group-vol2
     vol2   (ocf::heartbeat:ZFS):   Started zfs3-node2
     vol2-ip    (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):   Started zfs3-node2

[intentions]

Thanks!